25 NASA Scientists Question the Sanity of the Global Warmists

submitted by sawboss from youtube.com

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Tom_Bombadil 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Is it? I'll not so sure.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Yes. It is.

[–]Tom_Bombadil 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

How do you know?

I agree that many of those appear absurd, but have you thoroughly investigated each and come to this conclusion on your own?

Google is now using it's algorithms to censor an alarming volume of formerly available info.
If you look for info on the major search engines then you be inundated with propaganda.

If you were to decide to investigate any supposedly ridiculous claim, then I would strongly recommend asking the most credible source where to find info, so you can decide for yourself based on any available evidence.

The most receptive and open-minded source that I am aware of is JasonCarswell.
He is exceptionally open-minded and I consider him a reliable source of info; even though I disagree with him on a number of issues.

The only fact that you can always be certain of is: You don't know, what you don't know.

I do know however that 3 buildings collapsed into their own footprint on 9/11, and that one of them was never damaged by any aircraft..
This is obvious controlled demolition. Terrorists didn't do this, and it was never investigated as a crime.
Wouldn't you agree that this should be investigated as a crime?