you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Jesus 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Your very welcome. Read the studies I linked and then read the industry studies to get an idea of the controversy.

[–]magnora7[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I mean it kind of makes sense, a lot of molecular connections have a resonant energy/frequency. This is how they manipulate chemicals in particle physics. I can imagine a complex protein acting as an antenna to a wide variety of frequencies, and if too much of a certain resonant frequency is input, the protein might permanently deform to an non-functional shape.

Like in atomic physics there is the "Balmer series" which is basically a mapping of the resonant frequencies output by a hydrogen atom. So if you bombard it with any one of these, the atom will "ring like a bell" so to speak, as the electron is energized and moves in to higher energy states. Then when it relaxes from the high energy state to the low one (which are discreet quantized levels, this is where the "quantum" in quantum physics comes from) so it always outputs the exact same energy.

So if you bombarded a hydrogen atom with all the frequencies from the Balmer Series, it would eventually ionize. Before the electron is ejected, it's non-ionizing radiation, even if the electron is dancing around the nucleus at a very high energy level. But the moment the electron gets too energized, it hops out and leaves forever, and then it's ionized. Non-ionizing radiation just gives the electron energy, and it eventually relaxes back in to the lowest-energy state, and emits a photo ("heat") in the process. The frequency of the photons emitted as the electrons jump down the various quantum energy levels creates the Balmer series.

Sooo... with all that considered, there's also molecular bonding. Like pi bonding and covalent and ionic bonding. Which themselves all have a resonant frequency and associated energy (the frequency and energy of a photon are always exactly proportional because photons always travel at the speed of light in discreet individual packets, like you cannot have 1.3 of a photon)

So I think the whole theory of non-ionizing non-heating radiation absorption working to change molecular bonds seems to depend on the energy levels of these bonds, and how responsive they are to the photons they interact with. A molecule is a distributed system, a cloud of electrons, so it has many more ways to distribute heat before electrons end up being ionized.

But in the instance of a pi bond, or something like that, it's hard to say what would happen...

I mean obviously this stuff has been tested for safety quite a bit over the decades. But it's possible there's 1 protein human beings have they overlooked, that happens to have a shape that seriously catches the frequencies put out by 5G, and thus degrades because of all the internal heat within the molecule (and basically "shakes apart" as that's what heat is).

So a good experiment would be to find whatever proteins they claim are degraded by 5G (even if that's DNA or whatever) and then expose it to very high levels of sustained 5G electromagnetic activity. Then the degradation should be able to be tested and verified in a reproducible way.

So if I found quality studies that verify that, and they can be reproduced, then I'll begin to be concerned. Then it also has to be verified that at normal 5G exposure levels, the degradation still occurs (instead of the captured energy just dissipating through heat conduction like normal).

Basically the rate of absorption has to outpace the rate of dissipation for a given protein, when exposed to 5G traffic, in order for there to be a provable health concern. Which is basically just heat tbh, but in very specific conditions.