you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]magnora7[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Yes the passwords are already encrypted, but we want additional layers of encryption since people could sit there and hack the database if they have full access.

Like you say, we probably will just end up not including direct messages or things from private subs.

[–]RuckFeddit 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

It's standard encryption right? so what will they do, reverse engineer the AES 256 or whatever encryption you guys are using? I don't really know how you'd add an extra layer without adding some program that will provide another table of user login information.

None of this seems necessary IMO, if peoples accounts are stolen when their passwords are encrypted using public key then tough luck. Nobody here really cares about the karma, it's about the content being honest.

[–]bobbobbybob 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

The problem with currently uncrackable encryption is that it only takes a few years to become crackable. that's why 'dark' net transactions are so dumb. The PTB just need to obtain archives and sit on them until they've got the tech to open them. 5 years? 10?

Magnora7 is correct in his concerns.