Catholic church admits that a telescope named LUCIFER (later shortened to LUCI) is at the Vatican outpost in Arizona and that they have access to it. They deny "owning" it.... but they funded it. They used a telescope named LUCIFER, which is the name of God's adversary!

submitted by In-the-clouds from john1126.com

all 16 comments
sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun

[–]adultmanhwa 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Lucifer? its not a problem then. Your misunderstanding stand from cannot differentiate between "heylel ben shakar" (light of dawn, the boaster) and "Lucifer" (light bearer). Both are obsiously distinct.

[–]In-the-clouds[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

After the apostasy from God, Lucifer now only gives a false light.

Jesus is the true light that came from heaven. He came to his own, but his own did not receive him. People reject Jesus because they prefer darkness rather than light. If they came to the light, their sins would be reproved. But all who confess their sins and turn to Jesus for forgiveness shall be saved.

Lucifer and Jesus are battling for the souls of men. Jesus already won on behalf of all that receive the sacrifice he made on the cross. Lucifer wants all souls to be enslaved. Jesus wants all souls to be free.

[–]In-the-clouds[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Source of the Catholic church publication admitting that the LUCIFER / "LUCI" telescope is at the Vatican outpost:

https://terenabell.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/SKY_155_p74-77_lookingforgod.pdf

Edit: The publication was written by Terena Bell who says she "went to meet them to find out more about their research projects." According to her bio, where she is shown with one eye covered, "in 2012, was appointed to President Barack Obama’s White House Business Council". Obama and the Pope?

[–]Rah 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Shall not prevail. It will be reclaimed, in God's name and glory.

[–]iDontShift 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

there are only a few super strong telescopes

all of them our owned by big corp/big gov

the earth is flat. microwaves towers are set at the same height and do not consider ground curvature, yet every mile is suppose to be 8 feet of drop. mmmm me thinks ball earthers might need to try thinking

[–]HugodeCrevellier 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Pretending to believe that planet earth is flat, that contrarian exercise (to see how far something so obviously false can be taken), is not that interesting, and it distracts from real issues.

[–]iDontShift 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

pretend? hahahaha

pretending is what ball earthers are doing on an epic scale

while satellites are balloons, microwaves send signals in straight lines only being blocked by mountains and hills...

my God the ball earthers are so dumb they don't even demand to know the curvature of the earth (try and look it up on wikipedia .. lol)

and this figure is so elusive, that when 'found' and applied... oops it doesn't actually work

[–]HugodeCrevellier 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (10 children)

'Lucifer' means 'bringer of light' ... literally ... and that's a great name for a telescope.

But no ... 'God's adversary', the enemy of a deity that, accordingly, must therefore be the ... 'bringer of darkness'?

Also, a deity with an equally magic and invisible adversary in a ... 'mono'-theism?

But of course! :/

So much damage has been done because the Romans were somehow fooled into conflating 'The One' (a Platonic philosophical concept for the original/universal consciousness) with the worship of 'Yahweh' (some primitive, barbarous and demonstrably evil Middle-Eastern tribal deity, and its associated mythology) ... leading to all kinds of nonsensical crap.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

Romans seemed pretty high IQ. Tell me how a cult banned by emperors outlived them all.

[–]HugodeCrevellier 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Starting with Constantine (whose mother, 'a woman of low social standing', was a follower of the cult) it was soon promoted by Roman Emperors. It offered justification for the kind of dictatorial system of government which they liked, with an absolute monarch/'Lord'/dictator-deity ruling the Universe, with no checks nor balances from other perspectives/Gods. Roman emperors are the ones that imposed it upon the empire. Had it not infected Roman Emperors, that cult, and the distasteful self-serving tribal bullshit that went with it, would have remained obscure ... probably for the better.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

So, if I understand you correctly, Constantine, rather than promoting a cult of emperor worship like earlier emperors, instead chose to use a cult that claims there are moral values that not even an emperor can disobey? This he saw as a brilliant idea to control the people in the empire?

[–]HugodeCrevellier 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

'If', you don't, nor do you seem to be trying to. So, where to begin? I suggest reading Plato's Euthyphro as a start, perhaps.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Then explain it because I don't know how to interpret it without you either calling him or his mother low IQ.

For example, if he simply believed things because his mother says so, it does not reflect well on him.

If he didn't believe, calling himself a god like other Roman emperors would give him more absolute power than a cult that says someone else is king and not even the emperor can disobey. This is, for example, why Christianity is persecuted in China: the idea that state is not to be obeyed when the laws are evil.

[–]In-the-clouds[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Lucifer wasn't always evil. He was God's first originally created spirit. And he was exceptionally beautiful and perfect, because God made him perfect, the same as all the other spirits God made. But because of free will, Lucifer chose to reject God (and his love) and lost his bright nature and became dark, the opposite of God.

invisible adversary

Lucifer was the opposite: he was visible, while God is invisible. The other spirits could see Lucifer, but could not see God. They wanted to see God, but could not. Lucifer tried to take God's place and convinced many spirits to follow him and reject God.

The solution: God became man and man became God through the man Jesus Christ. Jesus died on the cross so that the spirits that rejected him and fell here with Lucifer may repent and be forgiven of their enormous guilt.

[–]HugodeCrevellier 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

What do you mean 'was' this or that, 'beautiful', 'visible', etc?

Don't Yahweh-worshippers believe that the deity's adversary currently 'is' (e.g. 'visible') ... as in today?

As for that ... 'solution':

It's that the deity then becomes human, and vice versa, in order to be sacrificed to the deity (i.e. itself!?), so that it (the deity i.e. itself) can be appeased into forgiving humans (sparing them from mass murder) ... oh, and into forgiving the spirits that rejected it and fell here with Lucifer, so they may repent and be forgiven of their enormous guilt.

OMG, pardon the pun.

If it were just you believing such stuff, as opposed to entire institutions, and a large chunk of our species, with you being just another follower among billions, I'd suspect some kind of mental issue.

Well, I still do ... only it's a mass mental issue ... and it may prove to be our species' 'great filter'.

[–]In-the-clouds[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

You are not forced to accept the sacrifice of Jesus Christ made on your behalf. You are free to choose another destiny, but then you will have rejected God's love all over again and be headed to a place devoid of love. You insult other people, while I didn't say anything about your IQ or your mental health. There is no need for us to continue talking.