you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]useless_aether 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

just a tought. in modern politics imperialism usually means american imperialism. so the negative connotations will damage america. this is fine with chomsky, so he is using it, promoting it. the international socialists and communists always wanted to destroy america anyway.

but with 'empire', the association might not automatically be with america, but with the british, holy roman, roman empires, which is a big no-no. those things must be kept outside of the overton window.

[–]magnora7 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Interesting thought, but I'd say chomsky makes comparisons of the US to past failed empires all the time. I've read a few of his books, he doesn't shy away from that kind of comparison in my experience. But you might have a point, I will keep that in mind from now on