That's undeniably true, but also not really related to what I said.

In the context of our discourse, it is imperative to acknowledge the distinction between the validity of a statement and its relevance to the matter at hand. While it is certainly true that the assertion you presented holds its own merit, its connection to the topic we are delving into remains tenuous at best. To expound upon this, the veracity of a statement hinges upon its correspondence with objective facts or established principles. In this regard, the statement you have proffered undoubtedly stands as a valid assertion. However, the mere fact that a statement is true does not necessarily render it germane to the discussion at hand. Relevance, on the other hand, pertains to the bearing that a statement has on the topic under consideration. It is in this regard that your statement falters. To illustrate this point, let us consider the following analogy. Imagine that we are engaged in a discussion about the most effective methods for cultivating tomatoes. In the course of this discussion, you introduce a statement about the nutritional value of carrots. While it is indisputable that this statement is true, its relevance to our topic of conversation is questionable at best. The nutritional value of carrots, while undoubtedly significant in its own right, does not directly contribute to the discussion of tomato cultivation. Similarly, in the context of our current discourse, the statement you have presented, while true in its own right, fails to engage with the topic we are exploring. We are delving into the complexities of a particular subject, and your statement, while possessing inherent truth, does not elucidate or contribute to our understanding of this subject. It is important to recognize that the purpose of a discussion is not merely to string together a series of true statements. Rather, it is to delve deeply into a particular topic, examining it from various angles and perspectives. In this pursuit, relevance serves as a guiding principle, ensuring that our statements contribute meaningfully to the exploration of the topic at hand. Therefore, while the statement you have presented may hold true in its own right, its lack of relevance to our current discussion renders it tangential and ultimately unproductive. It is akin to introducing a discussion about astrophysics into a conversation about marine biology. While both topics are fascinating in their own right, their interconnectedness is tenuous at best. In conclusion, the validity of a statement and its relevance to a particular discussion are two distinct concepts. While it is important to ensure that the statements we make are true, it is equally crucial to consider their relevance to the topic at hand. By adhering to this principle of relevance, we can ensure that our discussions remain focused, productive, and meaningful.