Trump too senile to remember when *he* was president.

submitted by ActuallyNot from thedailybeast.com

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]BobOki 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

looks at the wall of text trying to dick suck a rich person

No thanks, keep your delusions and let me know when those rich old white children sniffers send you all that money you must think you will get for defending them. The rest of us will be back here, laughing at your partisan ass.

p.s. Last I checked it was 100% ok and encouraged by the current administration to discriminate against white males, so maybe stop spreading that hypocritical propaganda.

[–]ActuallyNot[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

looks at the wall of text trying to dick suck a rich person

Sorry. What's your point here?

p.s. Last I checked it was 100% ok and encouraged by the current administration to discriminate against white males, so maybe stop spreading that hypocritical propaganda.

I'm not familiar with discrimination against white males. Where do you check to see the percentage of how ok it is?

[–]BobOki 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

Point is I see you defending a rich politician. Gross.

If you are not familiar, I assume either you are all in, or you live under a rock and have not seen technology past the rotary phone. There is no other way you could not have it shit all in your face without just lying.

[–]ActuallyNot[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Point is I see you defending a rich politician. Gross.

It's not gross to defend someone against false attacks. Especially in politics where an attack against one person is support for an opponent. Who, in this case, is probably worth a few hundred times more.

If you are not familiar, I assume either you are all in, or you live under a rock and have not seen technology past the rotary phone.

White males aren't a particularly at risk group for discrimination. Especially in the white-house. Of the 45 presidents, 44 have been white males, and the other was an unusually great orator.

What group are white males at a disadvantage to because of discrimination?

Where do you check to see the percentage of how ok it is?

[–]BobOki 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

TIL, the white house is how we decide what is or is not discrimination. What a weasely way to completely avoid the topic while acting like you were actually talking about it by saying something UTTERLY not related in any way at all. Thats not even a strawman it's so laughably bad.

So, were we are is you continue to comment literally nothing of substance to anything I say, can't even properly use a starwman, and are just blatantly poisoning the well. We are done here sir.

[–]ActuallyNot[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

TIL, the white house is how we decide what is or is not discrimination.

You were talking about the current administration. I assumed you meant the white house.

Which administration were you talking about?

What a weasely way to completely avoid the topic

It's always projection.

The question you keep weasling out of was: "Where do you check to see the percentage of how ok it is?"

This is the third time I've asked.

[–]BobOki 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Your question is a straw man, why would anyone give any time or effort into a logical fallacy? If you have to use those, or usually shortly after ad hominen attacks, which you have not really done but just saying usually that is next, you lost the debate before it started. Do better.

[–]ActuallyNot[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Your question is a straw man, why would anyone give any time or effort into a logical fallacy?

Really. So when you said: "p.s. Last I checked it was 100% ok and encouraged by the current administration to discriminate against white males, so maybe stop spreading that hypocritical propaganda."

Where did you check, and how did you get the 100%?