91 criminal charges

submitted by g0ldfish from msn.com

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]g0ldfish[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (26 children)

These are strange mental gymnastics. Regardless of whatever you're trying to argue:

If Trump remains the GOP nominee, Biden will win. Many in the GOP don't want that, but in the meantime, Fox and others are brainwashing their viewers into thinking these serious federal charges are unimportant.

[–]MuskyIndependent 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (19 children)

Biden couldn't win against a wet fart. If the Democrats weren't worried about Trump these charges wouldn't have been pursued. 🍌

[–]g0ldfish[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (18 children)

Biden couldn't win against a wet fart.

He won the last election. Look it up. Ask your neighbor.

If the Democrats weren't worried about Trump these charges wouldn't have been pursued. 🍌

Democrats didn't charge Trump.

Name one charge that shouldn't be pursued.

[–]MuskyIndependent 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (17 children)

He won the last election. Look it up. Ask your neighbor.

I used to think so, not so sure about that anymore. But even if Biden really did win last time, he wouldn't again.

Democrats didn't charge Trump.

Fani Willis is a Democrat working on behalf of the party.

[–]g0ldfish[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (16 children)

Willis is merely the district attorney of Fulton County, Georgia. She did her job. Name any of the charges brought by her office, or any of the other charges brought by other offices that is unfair or inappropriate. (No Saiditor has made an argument against any of the charges, because they know they'd be wrong.)

[–]MuskyIndependent 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Wake me up when Biden gets charged.

[–]g0ldfish[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Meh - enjoy sleeping - Saidit is the best place for that

[–]weavilsatemyface 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (13 children)

Name any of the charges brought by her office, or any of the other charges brought by other offices that is unfair or inappropriate.

  • Encouraging people to watch TV.
  • Reserving a room at the Georgia Capitol for a meeting.
  • Requesting signature verification. Asking for signatures to be verified, as required by law, is a criminal act now.
  • Asking for phone numbers.
  • Making phone calls.
  • Encouraging somebody to attend a hearing.

https://thefederalist.com/2023/08/15/how-stupid-is-the-georgia-anti-trump-case-they-indicted-trump-for-tweeting-at-people-to-watch-tv/

If Putin had charged one of his political enemies with an indictment like this, what would you think? This is Banana Republic third-world dictatorship shit.

[–]g0ldfish[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (12 children)

Those are not the charges. Again, do you have any interest in the facts?

[–]weavilsatemyface 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (11 children)

They are literally items on the indictment. They are the facts.

[–]g0ldfish[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (10 children)

They are literally RELATED to the charges, but they are NOT the charges. He is NOT charged with any of those activities. They are not against the law. WTF is wrong with you, mate?

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (9 children)

What are you, a conspiracy theorist?

[–]weavilsatemyface 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

Biden will win.

Biden will win even if not one single person casts a vote for him. The people counting the votes will see to that.

[–]g0ldfish[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

So you have absolutely no interest in the facts?

[–]weavilsatemyface 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

So you have absolutely no interest in the facts?

Which facts are you talking about? An indictment is an accusation not proof. Trump is accused of crimes, and the so-called "evidence" for his guilt includes things like he tweeted that people should watch television.

It is a fact that the indictment includes such ludicrous items as asking for phone numbers. It is not proven that anything Trump did was illegal.

It is, however, a fact that the timing of the indictments happen to be perfect to push Biden's corruption case out of the headlines. Each time more damning evidence of Biden's corruption comes out, within a day there's another set of accusations against Trump. What an amazing coincidence that it.

[–]g0ldfish[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Forget these stupid, irrelevant mental gymnastics. This is a waste of time. Read about the charges. https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2023/trump-charges-jan-6-classified-documents

[–]weavilsatemyface 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Read about the charges.

The US justice system has descended into third-world levels of corruption with these charges. Actually that's been the case for a long time, but only affecting the Little People.

The question, how far into the sewers is the DoJ willing to descend to interfere with the election process? Is this just an attempt to distract Trump and blacken his name, and all charges will be dropped after the election? Or do they actually intend to go through with their fake charges for fake crimes and stitch him up?

[–]g0ldfish[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The US justice system has descended into third-world levels of corruption with these charges.

And you know this because you have analyzed all of the charges in detail and understand that the lawyers have been mistaken, and you are willing to name just one example here (because no one else on Saidit can do this), while providing evidence in the legal statutes, etc., etc?

No - you have no reliable argument or evidence for any of the charges. If at some point you think that you do, let me know. Otherwise, this is a 6-day-old post that has proven that no one on Saidit can challenge any of those 91 charges and indeed that SO MANY Saiditors defend Trump, which is REALLY fucked up.