use the following search parameters to narrow your results:
e.g. subreddit:pics site:imgur.com dog
subreddit:pics site:imgur.com dog
advanced search: by author, sub...
~2 users here now
It's All Politics
Trump indicted by special counsel Jack Smith over bid to overturn 2020 election
submitted 9 months ago by [deleted] from nypost.com
view the rest of the comments →
[–]ActuallyNot 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun - 9 months ago* (16 children)
you mean like the charges during the russian collusion thing ? baseless ...
No, that was proven.
And this indictment makes an incredibly detailed case. He knew that the election was correct, and he engaged in illegal conspiracies to overturn it.
That is, and should be very illegal. In the case of one of the charges, death penalty illegal.
[–]Mark_Shill 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 9 months ago (13 children)
proven to be bullshit lol
[–]ActuallyNot 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun - 9 months ago (12 children)
-https://www.acslaw.org/projects/the-presidential-investigation-education-project/other-resources/key-findings-of-the-mueller-report/
[–]Mark_Shill 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 9 months ago (11 children)
you seriously still believe this russia russia russia bullshit after it was proven to be fabricated? wow.
[–]ActuallyNot 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun - 9 months ago* (10 children)
Donald J. Trump and 18 of his associates had at least 140 contacts with Russian nationals and WikiLeaks, or their intermediaries, during the 2016 campaign and presidential transition. - https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2019/01/26/us/politics/trump-contacts-russians-wikileaks.html
These are some of the facts uncovered and proven, not "fabricated".
Why misrepresent things that are well enough documented in the Mueller report?
Are you seriously, after all this time, not aware of the facts? Or are you repeating lies for political reasons, and you're hoping that your audience won't read the report?
[–]Mark_Shill 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 9 months ago (9 children)
The Clinton campaign hired Perkins Coie, which then hired Fusion GPS, a research and intelligence firm, to conduct opposition research on Republican candidate Donald Trump’s ties to Russia. But on FEC forms, the Clinton campaign classified the spending as legal services.
“By intentionally obscuring their payments through Perkins Coie and failing to publicly disclose the true purpose of those payments” the campaign and DNC “were able to avoid publicly reporting on their statutorily required FEC disclosure forms the fact that they were paying Fusion GPS to perform opposition research on Trump with the intent of influencing the outcome of the 2016 presidential election,” the initial complaint had read.
The Clinton campaign and DNC had argued that the payments had been described accurately, but agreed, according to the documents, to settle without conceding to avoid further legal costs.
The Clinton campaign agreed to a civil penalty of $8,000 and the DNC $105,000, according to a pair of conciliatory agreements that were attached to the letter sent to the Coolidge Reagan Foundation.
The documents have not yet been made public and an FEC spokeswoman, Judith Ingram, said the FEC had 30 days after parties are notified about enforcement matters to release them.
The Steele dossier was a report compiled by the former British spy Christopher Steele and financed by Democrats that included salacious allegations about Trump’s conduct in Russia and allegations about ties between the Trump campaign and Russia.
Documents have shown the FBI invested significant resources attempting to corroborate the dossier and relied substantially on it to obtain surveillance warrants targeting the former Trump campaign aide Carter Page.
But since its publication, core aspects of the dossier have been exposed as unsupported and unproven rumors. A special counsel assigned to investigate the origins of the Trump-Russia investigation charged one of Steele’s sources with lying to the FBI and charged a cybersecurity lawyer who worked for Clinton’s campaign with lying to the FBI during a 2016 meeting in which he relayed concerns about the Russia-based Alfa Bank.
Trump, who has railed against the dossier for years, released a statement celebrating the agreement and once again denouncing the dossier as “a Hoax funded by the DNC and the Clinton Campaign”.
[–]ActuallyNot 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun - 9 months ago* (2 children)
The Steele dossier was an unproven private research report.
Mueller was a special council legally investigating charging people, and paying other charges on to the DoJ for further s action.
We know that there were over 140 contacts between Russia, Wikileaks and the Trump campaign because of things proven by Mueller.
[–]Mark_Shill 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 9 months ago (1 child)
not true lol bullshit, who are these contacts? name some
[–]ActuallyNot 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun - 9 months ago* (0 children)
Contacts as in communications.
The Mueller report details them all.
Here's an interactive summary:https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2019/01/26/us/politics/trump-contacts-russians-wikileaks.html
[–]Mark_Shill 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 9 months ago (5 children)
If Trump had colluded with Russia Russia Russia, he'd be in prison. He didn't and he's not. So, believe the lies all you want. Fact is, you cant change your mind on ANYTHING and believe all this bullshit all day long.
No Mueller considered the president of of scope.
He did detail his obstruction and lies to investigators, and stated that the report does not exonerate him, and that if he were exonerated, the report would have said so. But there was no investigation against Trump.
The dems should have gone ahead and changed him separately, but they felt it would be a bad move politically, firing up Trump's base and fundraising.
And that's how people get away with crimes of they're powerful.
Jack Smith is a veteran prosecutor though. And he is investigating Trump. I hope that Trump will find that he should have stopped committing crimes while he was president.
Time will tell
[–]Mark_Shill 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 9 months ago (3 children)
Here's whats next, felony jaywalking charges on Trump in NY in 1984
The crimes he's charged with are not minor. As has been noted, one can carry the death penalty.
Trying to overthrow an election by violence is not jaywalking.
The Russia collusion that ACTUALLY happened is the ex mayor of Moscow's wife giving The Biden Crime Family 3.5 million
[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - 9 months ago (0 children)
She didn't.
She paid consultancy fees to a company that the Bidens had no interest in, that has a similar name to one that Hunter Biden co-founded and was CEO of.
https://edition.cnn.com/factsfirst/politics/factcheck_e879bcfe-4b2a-4b4a-a823-8c6d512c4e5e
I mean whataboutism is still whataboutism, but your whataboutism is also bullshit whataboutism.
[–]twolanterns 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 9 months ago* (1 child)
that right there spells out you are just plain aiding and abetting the crimes involved
repent and be saved or away with you
waste of time which you have just proven
[–]ActuallyNot 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun - 9 months ago (0 children)
What?
view the rest of the comments →
[–]ActuallyNot 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun - (16 children)
[–]Mark_Shill 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (13 children)
[–]ActuallyNot 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun - (12 children)
[–]Mark_Shill 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (11 children)
[–]ActuallyNot 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun - (10 children)
[–]Mark_Shill 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (9 children)
[–]ActuallyNot 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun - (2 children)
[–]Mark_Shill 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (1 child)
[–]ActuallyNot 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)
[–]Mark_Shill 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (5 children)
[–]ActuallyNot 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)
[–]Mark_Shill 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (3 children)
[–]ActuallyNot 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)
[–]Mark_Shill 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (1 child)
[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)
[–]twolanterns 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (1 child)
[–]ActuallyNot 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)