use the following search parameters to narrow your results:
e.g. subreddit:pics site:imgur.com dog
subreddit:pics site:imgur.com dog
advanced search: by author, sub...
~0 users here now
It's All Politics
Fact check: Trump delivers wildly dishonest speech at CPAC | CNN Politics
submitted 1 year ago by dicknipples from edition.cnn.com
view the rest of the comments →
[–]Site_rly_sux 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - 1 year ago (6 children)
That logic is backwards
But you already admitted that the logic ISN'T backwards. You admitted it. Don't you remember? You made a post where you said "I admit the CNN logic isn't backwards and trump was therefore telling a lie here".
Oh, what's that? You didn't admit it? Does that mean I told a lie when I said you did? Be careful how you answer.
That's like when they said there's no evidence that the covid lab leak theory is true so it was wrong
You're missing half the sentence. There's no evidence so it's wrong to push a theory which has no evidence.
That's the wrong part. Nobody knows if it's factually right or wrong. People are just saying that you need more evidence than just saying "chyna kungflu"
[–]Elchampo 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - 1 year ago (4 children)
We know the Russia thing was just a political smear job, we don't need WaPo and NY Times to admit to lying to it. You are employing shoddy logic.
Except that turned out just to be political bullshit too. The lab leak was a Trump talking point, so the liberal media decided it would treat it as false. How are you okay with that deception?
[–]Site_rly_sux 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 1 year ago (3 children)
This is copied from your own comment above
He then said, “And they were exactly wrong. And now they’ve even admitted that it was a hoax. It was a total hoax, and they got the prize.”
I don't know why you're still arguing when you already admitted that trump was totally lying when he invented that part in bold. You admitted it, you said it already. Don't gaslight me, you said it, you personally said to me that you think trump was talking out his ass here. You admitted it.
Call me a liar.... go on do it...
The lab leak was a Trump talking point, so the liberal media decided it would treat it as false. How are you okay with that deception?
It's because I am a normal person, so I need evidence for the things people tell me before I believe them. It's not evidence to say "chy-na, very bad, they did a temendous number"
[–]Elchampo 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 1 year ago (1 child)
But what you're saying doesn't make any sense. You're trying to apply a bad sort of logic here.
[–]Site_rly_sux 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 1 year ago (0 children)
No sir.
Here is trump's statement.
The bold part is a lie that trump told.
Which you definitely agree with, because you already told me that you think trump was lying here, you admitted it. Why are you now pretending tha you didn't already admit that trump is lying here? You looked me square in the eye and you admitted "trump was bs'ing about that one".
Go ahead and tell me that you didn't. Tell me that I'm lying. Go on ...say it
[–]JewsAreOfColor 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 1 year ago (0 children)
Flagged for projecting your own racism onto the right under orders from the CCP whose complicity in germ warfare and the stealing of the election from President Trump is indisputable at this point.
Typing lies in bold text does not make them come true.
view the rest of the comments →
[–]Site_rly_sux 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - (6 children)
[–]Elchampo 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - (4 children)
[–]Site_rly_sux 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (3 children)
[–]Elchampo 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (1 child)
[–]Site_rly_sux 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)
[–]JewsAreOfColor 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)
[–]JewsAreOfColor 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)