Official Gov’t Docs Expose Michelle Obama’s 14 Year History as a Man

submitted by Alphix from rumble.com

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]ID10T 6 insightful - 4 fun6 insightful - 3 fun7 insightful - 4 fun -  (19 children)

This is one of the weirder conspiracies out there. Michelle Obama has all the physical characteristics of a XX female. No Adam's apple. Narrow hands and fingers. Wide hips. Pictures going back to her childhood in the 70s looking very much a little girl.

Definitely a flat earth level crazy conspiracy theory 😂

[–]Site_rly_sux 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (7 children)

But OP said it was an official government document! He sounded really sure too!

[–]ID10T 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

I'm super serial you guys!!!

[–]Alphix[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

I asserted no such thing. I just posted the link to the article for discussion.

THIS JUST IN: Web aggregators like reddit and saidit were created with the idea of discussing media such as articles and videos.

But this is probably too sophisticated a notion for you, right?

[–]Site_rly_sux 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Oh, in that case, when were you planning to do the responsible thing and properly contextualise this as a piece of hateful fake propaganda - which, of course you being so much more sophisticated than I am at all these notions, you realised from the get-go.

Is it a habit of yours, to introduce to political discussion, something which your five brain sixhead has correctly determined (in a sophisticated way), to be a hateful fake, a divisive fraud - without properly introducing it and contextualising it? Why would you do that? Weren't you going to inform us at some point that you had figured it out to be fake?

[–]Alphix[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Because I don't think everything is about ME.

But also, since you're here, I want to know what you think that is, swinging in its pants while it dances?

[–]Site_rly_sux 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

The question was, do you make a habit of posting what you have already identified as fake, without any warning?

Then you basically answered that you don't think it's fake and there's something in her trousers.

You can't have it both ways.

Is it fake? Or do you stand by the thread title where you wrote that you found some official documents?

[–]Alphix[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

You can CLEARLY SEE there's something in the trousers.

WHAT DO YOU THINK IT IS? That is PRECISELY my reason for posting this.

It seems like a penis to me. Yes, it seems outlandish and strange and impossible, yet... There it is! What do YOU make of it?

It's posted for discussing, that's all. I make no assumptions as to what people seeing this are supposed to think. That's what discussion is ALL ABOUT.

Why do you worry so much about a "THIS IS ABSOLUTELY FAKE, PEOPLE." warning or not? I trust the people who visit this site to come to THEIR OWN CONCLUSIONS. That's what using your brain is for. Maybe you should try it someday instead of asking that people tell you "THIS IS TREW" or "THIS IS FAYK" in the title itself.

[–]Site_rly_sux 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The question is, simply, did you find an official document here, or was that a lie? Because you seem to be trying to have it both ways.

You haven't linked to anything yet so I don't know what you're talking about. Honestly staring at another man's wife's trousers to catch a glimpse of her package is pretty gay. Are you gay? I would understand your hobby at bit more if so. No haters here, just trying to understand why you're so obsessed with this woman having a package.

Hey maybe it's her microphone hookup. Maybe it's a purse. Maybe it's a secret service tracker box. Who cares. It really doesn't matter to the world either way .

[–]zyxzevn 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (6 children)

I think it is pushed by intelligence to create a controlled opposition. Maybe with support by the Democrats themselves. Nothing makes the opposition worse, than have this weird theory about Obama's wife being male. It puts the opposition right in the trash.

The real problem of Obama is that he was a puppet for the billionaires, supported wars and pushed the climate scare agenda.

[–]Site_rly_sux 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

"Pushed by intelligence"

No, the conspiracy theorists aren't wrong about our imaginary enemies! Don't say that! Don't say that we have ridiculously low standards of proof, when a statement aligns to our fake worldview!

Instead, what's happening here is that the conspiracist's enemies are creating fake theories about themselves, which we conspiracists are accidentally spreading, because we have absolutely zero standards of evidence for statements which align to our fake worldview!! Nnnnnggghhhh

[–]zyxzevn 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

Yes. Intelligence are "imaginary". I go back to sheep.

[–]Site_rly_sux 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Right. The intelligence agencies are real.

And they put out fake conspiracy theories, including about themselves, which conspiracy theorists accidentally spread and propagate.

Not normal people, though. Normal people don't spread and propagate the fake information, which the CIA put out, about the former first lady. Only conspiracists. Why?

Why are the conspiracist's imaginary enemies, so capable of playing the conspiracist like a fiddle? It's inexplicable. A paradox.

[–]JewsAreOfColor 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The more you post these incoherent psychotic words salads in defense of the oligarchy, the more you prove, they have something to hide.

[–]dicknipples 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

You could apply both arguments to any politician. Rather than suggest that a post at Rumble (Rumble!) is somehow promoting the Obamas by attacking them in one of the cheapest possible ways, you could see this as a Rumble user acting exactly like a Rumble user (eg. with the maturity of a 12-year-old autistic rapist).

[–]zyxzevn 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Rumble is great. Youtube is sadly complete garbage and propaganda. Like reddit, mr Dick Nipples.

[–]Alphix[S] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

What's that thing in its pants as it dances?

[–]Alphix[S] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

I just want to know what's swinging in its pants as it dances.

[–]JewsAreOfColor 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

C-nsp-r-cy is a bootlicker buzzword and cr-zy is an ableist slur. Reported.

Stop misgendering Michael Robinson.