Alex Jones Hit With Nearly a Billion Dollars in Damages Against Him For Saying Sandy Hook Was a Hoax

submitted by raven9 from self.politics

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

This trial was a joke and did not follow our criminal justice's normal practices.

For instance?

[–]SoCo 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

The crazy discovery, the banned defense and banned things to mention. The pretending him personally, companies he is associated with, companies he owns fully or partiality, and his media personalities are all one in the same. Removing any testing of Journalistic Constitutional protections. Basic removing a fair playing field, which seems to be a disparaging one-sided trend.

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

The crazy discovery, the banned defense and banned things to mention.

But when you say "banned defense" you're not talking about the default judgement?

So what was banned, and what things to mention were banned?

And what was crazy about the discovery? (Except that Jones ignored it).

[–]SoCo 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

I was down with covid for a week and lost track of where we were with this, sorry.

The discovery demanded info from companies and entities not involved with the lawsuit or accusations.

[–]ActuallyNot 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Did it?

What information from which entities?

[–]SoCo 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

All information requested from entities not listed as defendants.