you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]package 10 insightful - 1 fun10 insightful - 0 fun11 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

So now we're pretending that not only was it an inside job, but there were no planes at all? You people are fucking psychotic.

[–]ShekelPa 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

Go fuck yourself. Either see the truth for yourself or kill yourself.

[–]package 8 insightful - 2 fun8 insightful - 1 fun9 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

There is plenty of footage of the second plane. There are plenty of people who witnessed the planes first hand or watched the second plane live on the day it happened. It's definitely a plane. It flies at a speed you would expect from a plane. It leaves a plane-shaped hole. The planes had passengers. Those passengers had friends, families, and coworkers. Those passengers are not alive today, according to their friends and families and coworkers. If you want to pretend that none of these people ever existed or are ALL liars, you are psychotic.

Also:

  • This is the actual size of a 767 engine

  • Black boxes are not designed to take the force of nearly half of one of the tallest structures in the world at the time falling on them at terminal velocity, especially not after taking the force of the plane crashing into a massive skyscraper.

  • Jet engines are barely recognizable if a plane flies straight into the ground at high speed. They can significantly shred themselves to pieces if just a single blade falls off the fan while at speed. They are also not designed to take anywhere near the weight of half of a skyscraper crushing down on them at high speed.

  • Guess what ground zero and the surrounding area was covered with, in addition to metal, concrete, and asbestos? Papers. As the towers fell, internal pressure from each floor blew out windows and ejected loose, light objects, including things like wallets and passports. These things did not take the ride to the ground inside of the falling building.

[–]ActuallyNot 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

This argument is very much not compelling.

If one side is using this level of reasoning it strongly implies that the evidence doesn't support them.

[–]alladd 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

seriously what kind of worldview does believing something so preposterous even lend itself to

does this help you navigate the world? thinking there's so much power and control you can't even fathom?

you know 9/11 could have happened the way they said and governments can still be corrupt, right?