all 6 comments

[–]StillLessons[S] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

The plot thus far:

Summer/Fall 2020: Hunter Biden's laptop surfaces after months sitting with repairman where he left it. Also after FBI refused to take it.

Fall 2020 (pre-election): MSM says "This story is a conspiracy theory." Intelligence sources confirm "This story is a conspiracy theory".

March 2022: New York Times confirms "The laptop is real," i.e. it was never a conspiracy theory. The story was real all along.

September 2022: Guardian says this story is "for fringe lunatics" [=another way of saying "This story is a conspiracy theory."]

Once the laptop itself is confirmed, trying to go backwards like this is a non-starter. How about trying instead to come to terms and face the truth of the power elite you have saddled humanity with? Are you really proud of this manifest evil? Can you not even imagine a world where this level of corruption is controlled rather than amplified? Try. Please try. Regardless of how bad you see Trump to be, by amplifying the in-our-face corruption contained on that laptop, you are steering our civilization into the wall at a very rapid pace now.

[–]hfxB0oyAPirate Party 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Perfect review. Where do I get it?

[–]ActuallyNot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

AFAIKT someone got Hunter Biden's laptop, or a copy of the same.

Nothing from the laptop has revealed illegal or unethical behavior by Joe Biden as vice president with regard to his son's tenure as a director for Burisma.

Fine. Be careful who has access to your laptop.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Nothing from the laptop has revealed illegal or unethical behavior by Joe Biden as vice president with regard to his son's tenure as a director for Burisma.

Thats not actually true. There is a message from Joe on that laptop confirming his knowledge of Hunter's foreign business dealings after explicitly claiming the he had no knowledge of them.

https://nypost.com/2022/06/28/calls-for-action-as-biden-voicemail-reveals-he-knew-of-hunter-china-deals/

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/white-house-dodges-questions-voicemail-joe-biden-hunter-biden-business-dealings

https://nypost.com/2022/07/27/hunter-bidens-biz-partner-called-joe-biden-the-big-guy-in-panic-over-laptop/

[–]ActuallyNot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

“Hey pal, it’s dad. It’s 8:15 on Wednesday night. If you get a chance, just give me a call. Nothing urgent. I just wanted to talk to you. I thought the article released online — it’s going to be printed tomorrow in the Times — was good. I think you’re clear"

There's a long stretch from that to "illegal or unethical behaviour." Nor involvement in Hunter's business deals.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

There's a long stretch from that to "illegal or unethical behaviour." Nor involvement in Hunter's business deals.

I didn't say involvement in, I said knowledge of, which is what Biden denied having in 2020 while campaigning, which is clearly not true as this is from 2018. A bald-faced lie qualifies as unethical behavior in my book