It's sad (or telling?) when Tucker Carlson has the only rational reaction: Following Texas school shooting and Buffalo tragedy, leaders should ask this question

submitted by SoCo from foxnews.com

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]dingoatemytaco 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

Why be such a Carlson cuck, and an NRA cuck, and a GOP cuck? What's the motivation? Want more children to die? Fox News mentioned 50 solutions to the shooting, not one of them included gun control. Why is that? Fox is of course the literal propaganda mouthpiece for the GOP and their NRA donors. 90% of Americans want gun control. Mass shootings tripled after the expiry of the most recent AR prohibition gun law. The GOP stopped HR 8 in its tracks 2 years ago. Meanwhile Carlson's supporting the corrupt, greedy GOP, and thus additional mass shootings of children. Why do you also support this?

[–]fschmidt 5 insightful - 9 fun5 insightful - 8 fun6 insightful - 9 fun -  (3 children)

Want more children to die?

If it would prevent more people like you from growing up, then yes.

[–]SMCAB 4 insightful - 5 fun4 insightful - 4 fun5 insightful - 5 fun -  (2 children)

As funny as your response was, it's best not to get in the sandbox with this creature, you'll just come out with piss covered sand in your pants.

This asshat is running several accounts and it can't even remember which ones it's using at different times. It wants to make it seem like there are tons of its ilk here, and it most certainly upvotes itself from its alts. Pay attention, as clever as this literal retard thinks it is, it doesn't even switch up a bit of its language or seemingly Don Lemon like writing style.

Also, anytime a lefty faggot starts using the words snowflake, and cuck, you know that's straight out of the playbook. If you don't feed the trolls, they go back under the bridge and jerk their 2 inch rockets, or take out their frustration on their fat mothers when the honey mussie gets low.

[–]Three_Rainbow_DildosProhibition Party 8 insightful - 5 fun8 insightful - 4 fun9 insightful - 5 fun -  (1 child)

Isn't that retard the exact same moron as 'socks'? It's all the same bullshit: blame inanimate objects instead of those who use them, Tucker Carlson is evil and should die, Putin is evil and should die, the GOP are 'Far-Right' and evil and they should all die, same with the NRA, Fox News, 'the 1%', etc., which he views as all working together as part of some kind of conspiracy against the '99%' in typical Marxisant fashion?

But also Ukraine and vaccines, even though they are promoted by the exact same '1%' elite, are absolutely 100% good, and if you don't like either of them, well, you are evil and should die. In typical progtard fashion? That of a wannabee rebel who is too dumb to see that he's actually on the side of the elite?

And if it is indeed the same braindead moron, just why hasn't he been banned for ban evasion yet?

[–]SMCAB 4 insightful - 5 fun4 insightful - 4 fun5 insightful - 5 fun -  (0 children)

I do believe it is socks. Remember when the Unabomber got caught by a linguist? For someone so smart you'd think the fatfuck would figure that out.

Very well said. Spot on.

As far as the ban? I don't really care for banning, what I'd rather see is it exposed and have no interaction, with anyone. That would be much more rewarding. It only exists because people can't see how it operates, and they continue to give it its tendies, which in this case, is replies. There are several replies above from some pretty prolific users that should get it, without those, socks, boobiebro, dingoatemytaco, and nodiggity go away. And when they come back with another name, it would only take two or three posts to figure it out. There are so few people posting here it really isn't that hard to put it all together.

[–]SoCo[S] 1 insightful - 3 fun1 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

You seem more focused on defining teams than saving children.

Gun control is an obvious farce which does not impact the many violent acts.

Everyone knows the growing mental health problem in America is massive and at fault...until it is an election year and some Constitution eroding gun grabber bills are on the line, then they forget.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 3 fun1 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

not one of them included gun control. Why is that?

Because gun control doesn't work. Look at Chicago. Why does your political sports team continue to push these failed policies?

90% of Americans want gun control.

Misinformation. Not sure I ever met anyone but a shitlib who wanted gun control, and I don't live in shitlib areas. It couldn't possibly be 90%. If you find a source that can go right to s/shitpostnews.

Carlson's

I haven't even listened to what he said yet, dude annoys me. He may be saying something that resonates with the people here but let us not forget he's a useless scion like Taylor Lorenz, Chelsea Clinton, Anderson Cooper, Hunter Biden, etc.. that consider themselves "elite" compared to us peasants.

[–]TooMuchClay 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Except they did. Fox's Guttfield and his rent-a-friend segment raised the complexity of the issue and its resultant conflicting solution propagation -which included gun control-.

Tucker Carlson's segment is real investigative journalism packaged into a short rhetoric video-bite. There is clearly real depth behind his (teams) work, but the reductive format introduces omission and semantic errors; there's a couple of obvious ones at the least that I find each "episode".

[–]socks-the-nigger 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Yes