all 11 comments

[–]Jesus 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Welfare is good. Welfare by corporatists and Zionist Jews is like holding your hand on an electric fence.

[–]jet199 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Same thing happened in the UK. When Tony Blair and New Labour came in with loads of benefits then social mobility ground to a halt.

[–]IkeConn 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

They keep moving here in droves but they still vote wrong. Why would you vote to recreate what you just escaped?

[–]OrionBlastar 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

Communism is great if you don't want to own any property.

[–]Canbot[S] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

no, even then it is shit.

[–]OrionBlastar 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Well, I stand corrected.

[–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

So Jewish Bolsheviks bankrolled by banks?

[–]OrionBlastar 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

George Soros is the bank.

[–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Soros is one small player.

[–]StillLessons 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Liberalism is premised on the concept that money is free. How else could someone give someone else money when the recipient needs to produce nothing at all to receive it? Money conceptually represents an exchange of value. The person receiving the money should offer a value equivalent to that which is represented by the money. In other words, by definition, if we define money as a placeholder for value, then giving money to a person for doing nothing defines that money as having zero worth.

Charity practiced individually is a gift to the recipient of the value created when the giver received the money in return for some valuable energy expended. Government welfare is not the same, because the government never created any value in the creation of the money. The money is empty, so to speak.

Long story short, when the government gives people worthless scrip and claims they are offering them power, it is a lie. The only purpose of government welfare is to give the wealthy who own the levers of power the excuse to steal from those in the population who are actually producing physical products that are true wealth, not the imaginary kind.

[–]iamonlyoneman 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

"No." -leftards