you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Daddiescummies 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

That's literally what he's arguing about.

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Not really, but if you are intent on being a shill, then ok, I guess you can misconstrue things in that way.

I hear him referencing a data drive, making various counter arguments to the mainstream narrative, and basically saying at the end that there needs to be a lawsuit or some kind of public debate where trained individuals like himself can be allowed to share their own results from research and daily experience. I think he made arguments that you don't like to hear, like us not needing masks and vaccines, but too bad.

I accept that there are doctors on both sides of the aisle who agree and don't agree with the narrative. I can read their works and come to my own conclusion, I'm sure his flash drive has information on there that a shill like you couldn't refute.

The dude is willing to testify in court. He is willing to go down for the truth. He has more heart than Fauci, and I appreciate that.

Your username makes you seem like a child raping priest, btw.

[–]Daddiescummies 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I'm sure his flash drive has information on there that a shill like you couldn't refute.

"This is my argument, and I have evidence, but you can't see it and I won't discuss any of the actual evidence. I also won't use objective measures or refer to specifc numbers or mechanisims, then question the validity of any data presented without basis."

-the antivax playbook