you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]turtlew0rk 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Amounts to? What? I am talking about your title vs what she actually said. You are editorializing something that doesn't need it.

[–][deleted]  (3 children)

[deleted]

    [–]turtlew0rk 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

    It wasn't effectively what she said. Effectively what she said is that they are going to do door to door outreach in targeted communities to get people to get vaccinated by provided them with the materials and info they need on how safe and accessible the vaccine is.

    That is what she said. Your title is misleading and the articles title is even more misleading. This does not clarify anything. It is speculation. Not saying it isn' possibly sound speculation and shouldn't be considered. I am saying people are going to present this as fact and look like an idiot and it is going to hurt those of us worried about this overreach.

    When you are presenting a case against the narrative it is important to keep with the facts.

    [–][deleted]  (1 child)

    [deleted]

      [–]turtlew0rk 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

      Oh, my bad. I thought you were the OP for some reason. Hate when I do that.