you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Jesus 8 insightful - 3 fun8 insightful - 2 fun9 insightful - 3 fun -  (21 children)

Zionists did 9/11

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (20 children)

They know who did 9/11

They were Saudis. Saudi Arabia, as with the rest of the Arab world, are not generally Zionists.

[–]Jesus 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (19 children)

Securing the realm doc shows that Zionists actually want to destroy Saydi Arabia, eventually. Mossad and Zionist Jews and neocons did 9/11, period. Not one muslim hijacked planes or demolished any building. That was Zionist Jews who did that.

[–]ActuallyNot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (18 children)

Securing the realm doc shows that Zionists actually want to destroy Saydi Arabia, eventually.

Plausibly. And vice-versa probably. But they've both got more current problems to work through.

Hence why its difficult to believe they got so many Saudis to give their lives for the ... zionist ... cause.

[–]Jesus 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

They didn't. The hijackers were fake. A sham. A contrived pre-fabricated narrative.

[–]Jesus 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (16 children)

[–]turtlebam 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)

Some of the reddit pages are not online, we really need to start saving the info offline to be able to re-post it. I think it's safe to assume reddit will delete any important truth material.

[–]JasonCarswellVoluntaryist 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

Is there any kind of web-scrape archival system you know of?

Perhaps we should /s/AskSaidIt for recommendations and such regarding the /s/Cassy evolution beyond the limits of SaidIt.

Even if the archive platform was not decentralized, I would imagine that it could archive other archives, and/or might be able to zip and torrent for better distribution.

cc /u/LarrySwinger2, /u/Optimus85, /u/d3rr

[–]turtlebam 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Would be very interested in the topic if you make a post.

I do not know what system will work best and could survive any real data purge. I am not well versed on the topic but I think just an old fashioned way of focusing on one or a few subjects one is really interested in; condensing that information in PDF or saving the videos/audio that really matter and keeping them on local drives that are not connected to the internet are best.

I think it must go beyond simply saving and archiving everything, you need to organize all the data you have once you want to really use it, say in 10 years (supposing the current system continues), you want to inform someone about something. You will have to use the language of the day to get the message across. I only save what is important for particular subjects I know are important.

I wouldn't be surprised if a point is reached where they automatically delete the files they do not like remotely (especially on windows 10) Any online system is compromised, AI is getting better and the internet is getting faster everyday.

[–]JasonCarswellVoluntaryist 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Agreed.

This search engine seems ideal, but would be perfect with web-scrape and archiving and sharing over IPFS: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/YaCy

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

There's a ton of options out there. I'm not too familiar with any of them, but:

https://github.com/iipc/awesome-web-archiving

https://archivebox.io/

[–]LarrySwinger2Voluntaryist 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Actually, those are outlinks to Blogspot and they return 404 because they're encoded. You can decode them with tools like this one. You can just copy/paste the part that comes after "url=". It returns the real links:

https://shoestring911.blogspot.com/2007/10/todd-beamers-odd-phone-call-and-silent.html

http://911woodybox.blogspot.com/2012/10/united-93-received-18-acars-uplinks.html

cc /u/JasonCarswell

[–]ActuallyNot 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (9 children)

For lose meanings of "true".

So, those photos and videos of the second plane as it struck the tower ... that wasn't a plane, it was merely a drone, clad to look excatly like the plane, and kept at the airport, with the knowledge of air traffic control?

And manufactured as a one-off from an factory somewhere controlled by Zonists?

Is that the gist?

[–]Jesus 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (8 children)

Yes, a passenger jet drone. So, not a drone in the sense of a small predator drone, but a passenger jet transfixed with remote control. They were able to do this back in the 70's and can do it now. This is probably what happened taken into account the drills and ArcGIS data. Yes. As for where they came from, or what happened after that fact, we do not know. We do know, hoever, that UA93 was flying well after it 'crashed.'

[–]ActuallyNot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

Yes, a passenger jet drone. So, not a drone in the sense of a small predator drone, but a passenger jet transfixed with remote control.

This remote control system is bolted on to an existing plane as a retrofit?

1) Who made this system?
* Was it a prototype?
2) Where was it fitted?
* What plane was it fitted to?
3) Where are there other examples of this system?

They were able to do this back in the 70's and can do it now.

Okay, show me who is selling and fitting these systems. Or even who has tested one. On a Boeing 767. Ever.

Yes. As for where they came from, or what happened after that fact, we do not know.

Well, having established that it exists, surely you can trace where it came from.

We do know, hoever, that UA93 was flying well after it 'crashed.'

Again. Link me to this data by which we "know" this.

[–]Jesus 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (4 children)

I just sent you the arcGis data. And the post explains in detail about it. I don't have all the answers but UA93 was flying that day after the alleged crash.

What we do know is what I posted in detail to you with sources. Read the long posts I commented to you, there you'll find and can read the data.

[–]turtlebam 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Just a thought, if you can ever compile some of your most important work in a PDF, that would be great idea. I scour your posts for info and save them manually into text, but some info is linked to other sites which I am afraid might be put down. This way some people can keep the PDF and easily upload them if they close more websites through torrents or can be a quick reference to copy and paste quality information into other forums.

I say this because I believe your research is one of the most important I ever came across. Either way I will try my best to save your content and try to spread it in anyway I can.

[–]ActuallyNot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I just sent you the arcGis data.

Sorry, I must have missed it.

Can you point out which of the links has the arcGIS data?

I don't have all the answers

No. I get that feeling. So I wonder how you reach a conclusion, particularly a grand conspiracy theory, involving false flags.

but UA93 was flying that day after the alleged crash.

An anomaly, if true. We should think about the plausible explanations.

[–]JasonCarswellVoluntaryist 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

You can play the skeptic forever, but instead of questioning Jesus (who knows his shit) about endless details why don't you do some research yourself?

We will never get all the answers simply because (((they))) control most of the information.

IMO, it's better to look at the big picture, the motives, who gains, and if they have a history of perpetual compulsive manipulation, deception, and lies.

Once you realize that "authority" (government, experts, media, corporations, banks, etc) are all liars and part of the globalist's effort for full spectrum dominance and enslavement of all of humanity, then it all makes much more sense.

[–]turtlebam 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Jesus knows what he is talking about. Most entertaining video on this subject: https://www.bitchute.com/video/xgT4RuWP2YL0/