you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]SaidOverRed 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

I'm lazy. Anyone want to verify the numbers on VRD's per capita? Obviously more interactions means more potentially related deaths even if there is no actual casual link (100% coincidence rate).

Assuming the numbers were tallied and pulled on the same day (unlikely, but hopefully negligable because there were additional vaccines besides the two larger covid vaccine producers) 1783/55220364 = .003% death rate.

Pure utilitarianism suggests this is an upgrade (costs aside) from the .3%ish death rate from covid since it's not even on the same scale

[–]Tom_Bombadil 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

(100% coincidence rate).

There's no shortages of this experimental gene therapy.
Hopefully, you've already received all them, and you're comfortable being contact traced until 2023, because that's the experimental agreement.
This is a logical default-position for anyone who wants to minimize the possibility of serious risks for someone else.

Here's some old info for anyone who isn't in the know.

Harvard Medical School Professors Uncover A Hard To Swallow Truth About Vaccines

Preliminary data was collected from June 2006 through October 2009 on 715,000 patients, and 1.4 million doses (of 45 different vaccines) were given to 376,452 individuals. Of these doses, 35,570 possible reactions (2.6 percent of vaccinations) were identified. This is an average of 890 possible events, an average of 1.3 events per clinician, per month. This data was presented at the 2009 AMIA conference.

This completely contradicts the CDC’s claim that 1/1,000,000 people are injured from vaccines.

The actual reality is probably far worse given:

What’s really telling is that the doctors state that there was never an opportunity to perform system performance assessments due to the fact that “the necessary CDC contacts were no longer available and the CDC consultants responsible for receiving data were no longer responsive to our multiple requests to proceed with testing and evaluation.”

They refused to participate in the completion of the study. Apparently, the CDC doesn't believe in science.

We know that they're deceiving the public given; motorcycle and roofing accidents (etc.) were labeled coco deaths.

So, we can safely add a couple of zeros to the front of the Coco death rates you presented.

[–]SaidOverRed 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

That's a nice upper estimate (from .003% minimum to 2.6% maximum), but I suppose we won't know how close the upper estimate is to the reality, if it's not tested fully.

[–]Tom_Bombadil 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Most people know someone who was injured with the wax.

I don't know anyone who died from the flu.

I know someone who had a heart attack, and they called it Coco. The family is furious.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

utilitarianism suggests this is an upgrade

Death isn't the only side effect.

[–]LesbianOutlaw 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Death isn’t the only side effect of contracting Covid either.