all 16 comments

[–]Tom_Bombadil 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

This may be true. Are these figures reported into the VAERS system?

994 may be the number they were willing to (or legally) document. However, sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) is strongly suspected as being a wax induced outcome.

Then there are the thousands of deaths in India from polio or experimental trials, etc.
Produced by the same pharma groups.

An honest accounting of fatalities and injuries would be off the scales of public imagination.

In 2021 the most dangerous of all, have just begun public experimention.

It's like we're currently living in the prologue of a disaster movie.

[–]chadwickofwv 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It's like we're currently living in the prologue of a disaster movie.

I'm pretty sure we are.

[–]NodeIndependent 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

One where you shout at the screen as the actors haplessly follow the script to their charactors doom.

[–]HiddenFox 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Fucking propaganda headline.... the numbers are correct. However, how many vaccines have been given from 2011 until late 2020 VS the last 3 months?

If we assume ever baby born gets a vaccine of some type ( a quick search shows about 4 million births in the USA a yesr) that's 40 million shots over the decade. The USA has given out 55 million shots in just 3 months.

I agree that these vaccines have a higher incidence rate but dont let the 994 vs 1755 number deceive and shock you. There is more to it.

(Understand there are more metrics to this. Some children dont get vaccines. Some adults would be getting them though out the decade. Also we are hyper vigilant with reporting right now. Last, anyone can post a report to this CDC site, not just doctors. My main point is this is a click bait headline displaying selected shocking stats.)

[–]whistlepig 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

If you're saying child birth vaccines account for the majority of vaccines then I have to strongly disagree. This data from the previous year's flu vaccine data states that around 150 million flu vaccines were administered that year. I assume that this does account for the largest percentage though, but I don't really know. There are a lot of vaccines out there and a lot of reasons to take them. Maybe a fair guestimate is 200 million? which is comparable to the number you gave for the covid ones so far this year. All the more so since the flu is no longer envogue.

[–]HiddenFox 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

You make a good point about the flu vaccine. I didn't consider it when I wrote my post. I've never taken the flu shot and in my mind I dont see it as being on the same level as something like a hepatitis vaccine.

It seems like every year I know people who got the flu shot and still got the flu. I had the flu once in my life (2019) and was over it in 3 days.

I guess the point I'm trying to make is that in my mind, from my experiences I see the flu shot as nothing more then a money grabbing placebo. TBO I can understand the elderly getting it as I'm sure there is some help the flu shot gives but for almost every one else... I just feel like it's a joke. Again, that's why I didn't consider it.

Also thanks for the civil response.

[–]SaidOverRed 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

I'm lazy. Anyone want to verify the numbers on VRD's per capita? Obviously more interactions means more potentially related deaths even if there is no actual casual link (100% coincidence rate).

Assuming the numbers were tallied and pulled on the same day (unlikely, but hopefully negligable because there were additional vaccines besides the two larger covid vaccine producers) 1783/55220364 = .003% death rate.

Pure utilitarianism suggests this is an upgrade (costs aside) from the .3%ish death rate from covid since it's not even on the same scale

[–]Tom_Bombadil 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

(100% coincidence rate).

There's no shortages of this experimental gene therapy.
Hopefully, you've already received all them, and you're comfortable being contact traced until 2023, because that's the experimental agreement.
This is a logical default-position for anyone who wants to minimize the possibility of serious risks for someone else.

Here's some old info for anyone who isn't in the know.

Harvard Medical School Professors Uncover A Hard To Swallow Truth About Vaccines

Preliminary data was collected from June 2006 through October 2009 on 715,000 patients, and 1.4 million doses (of 45 different vaccines) were given to 376,452 individuals. Of these doses, 35,570 possible reactions (2.6 percent of vaccinations) were identified. This is an average of 890 possible events, an average of 1.3 events per clinician, per month. This data was presented at the 2009 AMIA conference.

This completely contradicts the CDC’s claim that 1/1,000,000 people are injured from vaccines.

The actual reality is probably far worse given:

What’s really telling is that the doctors state that there was never an opportunity to perform system performance assessments due to the fact that “the necessary CDC contacts were no longer available and the CDC consultants responsible for receiving data were no longer responsive to our multiple requests to proceed with testing and evaluation.”

They refused to participate in the completion of the study. Apparently, the CDC doesn't believe in science.

We know that they're deceiving the public given; motorcycle and roofing accidents (etc.) were labeled coco deaths.

So, we can safely add a couple of zeros to the front of the Coco death rates you presented.

[–]SaidOverRed 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

That's a nice upper estimate (from .003% minimum to 2.6% maximum), but I suppose we won't know how close the upper estimate is to the reality, if it's not tested fully.

[–]Tom_Bombadil 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Most people know someone who was injured with the wax.

I don't know anyone who died from the flu.

I know someone who had a heart attack, and they called it Coco. The family is furious.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

utilitarianism suggests this is an upgrade

Death isn't the only side effect.

[–]LesbianOutlaw 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Death isn’t the only side effect of contracting Covid either.

[–]hfxB0oyAPirate Party 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Funny how when you vaccinate everyone in the country in a short period, the number of people in your sample who die goes up. It's almost like math or something...

[–]DustinM 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Just because it's in VAERS doesnt mean it was vaccine related.

[–]chadwickofwv 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Just because the cdc counts a death as covid does not mean it had anything at all to do with covid. In fact, according to the cdc itself only 6% can actually be attributed to covid.