you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Obviously, to do this:

Provide for the licensing of firearm and ammunition possession and the registration of firearms, and to prohibit the possession of certain ammunition.

Would not:

Literally End Your 2nd Amendment Rights Permanently

Better title:

H.R. 127 could require a firearm and ammunition license and registration, while prohobiting access to certain ammunition

In any event, the NRA will lobby, disinformation, and misinformation this to death. Congresspeople will be saying to any donor who will listen: how much is it worth to you to make this go away?

[–]NodeIndependent 7 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Any restriction on gun ownership is illegal.

[–]Zahn 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Yes this. Registries don't reduce crime, so they serve another purpose entirely. Most people who are not familiar with this sort of thing are easily mislead by Gov/corp propaganda into thinking it actually does something besides encroach on our civil liberties.