Wikipedia Repeatedly Scrubs All Evidence of Jen Psaki’s Brother’s Position as Portfolio Manager at Citadel 5 TIMES IN A ROW While Twitter and Reddit Get Caught Shadow Banning All Discussion

submitted by scrubking from redpilled.ca

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted]  (3 children)

[deleted]

    [–]IridescentAnaconda 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

    It's OK for math and established science.

    [–]cisheteroscumNational Justice Party 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

    and established science.

    You mean established science that doesn't challenge the narrative, like race or IQ does

    [–]IridescentAnaconda 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    Sure. Maybe I should have said "noncontroversial science". Let's just put it this way: if, at work, I have to look something up quickly, some established scientific factoid, then the wiki is pretty reliable for that. Even if it is a narrative that could be challenged, it probably wouldn't do me any good to try to challenge it at work. I don't generally use the wiki for anything personal, political, or spiritual unless I need a mainstream take.