University forces professor to change syllabus that threatened to dismiss students who argue against BLM, abortion or same-sex marriage

submitted by Vigte from cnn.com

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]jet199 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (11 children)

Free speech isn't a conservative value in much of the world. It's a liberal one.

[–]chadwickofwv 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (9 children)

Free speech is explicitly an American value. It doesn't exist anywhere else in the world. For anyone who wants to argue otherwise, lookup your blasphemy laws and shut the fuck up.

[–]jet199 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

You think all other counties have blasphemy laws?

[–][deleted]  (6 children)

[deleted]

    [–][deleted]  (2 children)

    [deleted]

      [–]Yin 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

      There are several videos out of Australia in just the last week of them arresting and confiscating the electronics of people who only posted that they want to protest wearing masks (regarding covid). It's sick to the core.

      [–]Yin 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

      Aforementioned recent examples from Australia:

      Case 1

      https://saidit.net/s/news/comments/6bc6/police_arrest_pregnant_woman_in_her_pyjamas_in/

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hcHUGZGT9V4

      Case 2

      Update: made a post for this one: https://saidit.net/s/news/comments/6byi/covid_insanity_in_australia_man_arrested_for/

      https://www.citizenfreepress.com/breaking/australia-has-gone-mad/

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jhqdM1opFbE

      For making online posts about protesting covid mask mandates, like this:

      https://i.imgur.com/NiVCKxR.jpg

      [–]wuzizname 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

      I can agree with “hate speech” laws only if the speech is overt and specifically calls for violence against a distinguishable group.

      So “fuck purple people, we should kill all purple people” would qualify. “I don’t like purple people” would not.

      Trouble is, slippery slope, we had someone call his MP a “cunt” and a “bitch” in Ottawa the other week and he’s being investigated for hate speech now.

      [–]Yin 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

      That's not what "hate speech" laws are in other countries, though. Hate speech laws in western nations are used to censor and imprison white people who don't want to be replaced and genocided and have their countries invaded and have open borders. Literally bluecheckmark influencers by the hundreds laugh about "killing whitey" all the time, not to mention the millions who aren't influencers who laugh about "killing whitey". Nothing happens, because the people who run society have anti-white ideology.

      [–]jet199 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

      Laws against calls to violence already existed.

      Hate speech is about offence.

      [–]denverkris 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

      Here's a good example of the thought police at work: https://www.womenarehuman.com/autistic-teen-found-guilty-of-hate-crime-for-asking-police-officers-sex-autism-group-condemns-prosecution/