all 18 comments

[–]Yin 16 insightful - 1 fun16 insightful - 0 fun17 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Record your communist professors legally. Expose the truth legally. If evil is not flooded with light, civilization will pass a tipping point worse than science fiction, where you can't reveal truth and evil even in a meme. "Education" is hijacked by anti-human, anti-progress, anti-white parasites.

[–]KennyLogins 7 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

She should be out of a job. She clearly has little regard for rules set forth by either our government or her own bosses. She may have changed her syllabus, but I don't believe for one moment that she won't discriminate against her own students, should they trip one of her insane wires.

[–]russkayacabbage 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

If I was a conservative student who could write well and willing to spend some time in court, I would write the majority of my papers specifically on those topics, then sue the living fuck out of the school when she inevitably gives them F's that can't be justified

[–]Lahontan 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (13 children)

Why doesn't this have more upvotes? Articles etc supporting conservative values do not get the same attention as those supporting liberal values. Apparently this is also true on a more conservative site like saidit.

[–]jet199 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (11 children)

Free speech isn't a conservative value in much of the world. It's a liberal one.

[–]chadwickofwv 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (9 children)

Free speech is explicitly an American value. It doesn't exist anywhere else in the world. For anyone who wants to argue otherwise, lookup your blasphemy laws and shut the fuck up.

[–]jet199 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

You think all other counties have blasphemy laws?

[–][deleted]  (6 children)

[deleted]

    [–][deleted]  (2 children)

    [deleted]

      [–]Yin 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

      There are several videos out of Australia in just the last week of them arresting and confiscating the electronics of people who only posted that they want to protest wearing masks (regarding covid). It's sick to the core.

      [–]Yin 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

      [–]wuzizname 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

      I can agree with “hate speech” laws only if the speech is overt and specifically calls for violence against a distinguishable group.

      So “fuck purple people, we should kill all purple people” would qualify. “I don’t like purple people” would not.

      Trouble is, slippery slope, we had someone call his MP a “cunt” and a “bitch” in Ottawa the other week and he’s being investigated for hate speech now.

      [–]Yin 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

      That's not what "hate speech" laws are in other countries, though. Hate speech laws in western nations are used to censor and imprison white people who don't want to be replaced and genocided and have their countries invaded and have open borders. Literally bluecheckmark influencers by the hundreds laugh about "killing whitey" all the time, not to mention the millions who aren't influencers who laugh about "killing whitey". Nothing happens, because the people who run society have anti-white ideology.

      [–]jet199 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

      Laws against calls to violence already existed.

      Hate speech is about offence.

      [–]denverkris 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

      [–]CCwind 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

      Probably because the article made the rounds on the front page a week or so ago. Not a complaint, just observing why it may not be getting as many comments or interesting.

      [–]JulienMayfair 6 insightful - 3 fun6 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

      One correction here: The instructor in question here is NOT a professor. She isn't named in this article as she was in previously articles on this situation. She has an MFA as a creative writer, and, as such, she is lecturer hired on contract, not a professor. She does not have a PhD.

      Hopefully, when her contract expires, she will not be re-hired.

      [–]ReeferMadness 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

      You can make them change the syllabus, but you can't make him grade fairly.

      [–]SaidOverRed 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

      This. I don't believe in cancel culture, but that this point it isn't moral to expose the prof to students. Reassignment to research is a must. Then just send it to the crapper when it's, you know, crap.

      [–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)