you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]ISaidWhatISaid[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

“Rather than organizing for change, individuals seek to enact a statement about their own righteousness,” Chomsky writes in “How (Not) to Challenge Racist Violence.” “They may boycott certain products, refuse to eat certain foods, or they may show up to marches or rallies whose only purpose is to demonstrate the moral superiority of the participants. White people may loudly claim that they recognize their privilege or declare themselves allies of people of color or other marginalized groups. People may declare their communities ‘no place for hate.’ Or they may show up at counter-marches to ‘stand up’ to white nationalists or neo-Nazis. All of these types of ‘activism’ emphasize self-improvement or self-expression rather than seeking concrete change in society or policy. They are deeply, and deliberately, apolitical in the sense that they do not seek to address issues of power, resources, decision making, or how to bring about change.”

YesBothSides #HorsehoeTheory

[–]EuropeanAwakening 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Dude, you're so clever. Don't pay any attention to the actual ideas, just claim they are both the same because they care about race and protest! Globalism versus nationalism? Same thing. Racialism versus race denialism Same thing. Universalism versus nationalism? Same thing. Individualism versus racial collectivism? Same thing. Third positionism versus neoliberal capitalism and communism? Same thing. Mass immigration versus repatriation? Same thing. HBD versus environmental determinism? Same thing. Materialist consumerism versus blood and soil? Same thing.

Phew, that was easy. Can we get back to fake opposition Conservatism and libertarianism now?