you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Jesus 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

Keep in mind, many people think England is still a monarchy but in the 13th century the country was incorporated and is now and has been a corporation, hence money flow.

Bitcoin is a scam. Nobody knows who created it but clearly it was created by someone or some entity. Satoshi, it is said created bitcoin. What does this name mean, it means the rise of the phenoix. Order out of chaos.

If anything else, a new currency, based on blockchain for nationstates will be used based on an SDR system. The Bank for International Settlements has written many articles about this transformation. When will it occur, I do not know.

But the new world order happened in 1863 and continued when the FED was created and when Social Security numbers were issued.

[–]AnarchySpeach 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

Bitcoin is a scam.

Isn't it better we don't know who made it? The code itself seems rather full proof in it's simple design.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)

Tbh, I followed the same little rabbit hole you basically just did - Trump was my final straw. I saw everything /u/Jesus discussed about Trump after his election, and more, including corruption and hypocrisy.

If you remember, Trump's whole campaign was very nationalistic and focused on "Making America Great Again" - focusing on the things that were bringing us down as a nation and correcting them, "draining the swamp". I've still got time to grow, and at the time of his campaign I was even younger and more gullible, but I was at the point of truly believing in my heart all elections were just political theater to give people the illusion of free-will and choice. When Trump started to run (someone who technically wasn't a politician like the rest), and wasn't afraid to say what he thought as well as was so focused on fixing "our problems", I thought I'd sit back and watch and give this thing one more chance and see what happens - in my heart I knew it was bullshit of course, but I still wanted to be proved wrong.

There's a reason Trump is called and often referred to as (one of) Israel's Best "US Presidents". Do you remember the government shut down that allegedly happened partially due to arguments over the construction of the boarder wall? Chuck Schumer and Nancy Pelosi, (who both seem to be more pro-Israeli than pro-American), were arguing during this time that the United States couldn't afford the requested budget at the time of $5.7 billion to construct the wall (in order to keep illegal immigrants as well as gang members out (which honestly did start to become a problem with MS-13 in certain states), as well as to stop drug and human trafficking, which are both big issues we have with that boarder), so the government shut-down happened. But during the government shut-down, we sent an installment of our 38 Billion "Military Foreign-Aid Deal" with Israel (which I don't understand why we even have as they are more than capable of defending themselves; Trump literally said he was going to crack down on foreign aid and focus interests on Americans.. right?), which they then used to build another wall to further protect "their land" from Palestinians. Trump also said it was time for the US to stop playing world police, and then he announced our country's recognition of Jerusalem as Israel's official capital.

Why do Nancy, Chuck and other Zionist/Pro/Dual-Israeli Citizens believe walls work, and support them in Israel, but think they're medieval, stupid and a waste of money in the United States? And if we as citizens, wish to use our tax money to secure our boarders because we're noticing a negative change occurring, how come we aren't allowed to, but the government can send our money in massive amounts to foreign nations, so those countries can build walls to secure their boarders? And why does Trump say one thing, and do another? So many questions if you actually believe this is all organic and authentic.

You can even check MotherJones for more information on how much foreign aid we've given to Israel.. It's almost as if.. We're their proxy? https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2014/02/us-israel-foreign-aid-military-bankroll/

Just read this article and see how they themselves, speak about their own people like Bernie Sanders. Honestly, they may wear different colors, it may be red vs blue, but at the end of the day, they are all on the same team. It's a hard truth I've come to accept, just like the fact that we'll probably never truly understand the true scope or reasoning behind all things that go on.

But if you're looking for truth, you can only hide from the authentic truth for so long. That's why censorship is becoming such a big issue.

[–]AnarchySpeach 1 insightful - 3 fun1 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 3 fun -  (4 children)

installment of our 38 Billion "Military Foreign-Aid Deal" with Israel (which I don't understand why we even have as they are more than capable of defending themselves;

To put it bluntly: We're buying an alliance and hoping it doesn't backfire. Same way a dude pays a hooker and prays they don't catch anything.

Despite the insanely high cost for something not worth a 10th of that, the U.S. has too many politicians with friends that would choose Israel over America, which has resulted in the government being unable to stop hemorrhaging money. Having Israel as a friend wouldn't be that bad. I think we can agree the price is too high right now.

It'd be like if the U.S. was sending shitloads of money to the Vatican. No Catholic politician would vote to stop that flow of money. They'd increase it. Make it worse.

Separation of Church and State is a very nice idea that fails miserably when attempted. There's a reason China's got police raiding unsanctioned basement churches. They realize the threat a foreign leader poses if it continues to have control over a growing number of the population.

At the same time I recognize the abysmal treatment the Chinese people suffer under such an abusive rule. It sucks, but I'd rather spend the $38b and keep my freedoms then attempt a religious purge of the government.

I don't have an answer for the problems this country is facing. Nor can I perceive a solution. If by some miracle we stopped giving away free money, you said it yourself:

they are more than capable of defending themselves;

We'd lose them as an ally in an instant. $38b is nothing to sniff at. The second we stop becoming a wallet for them they will ignore us, or worse, declare us an enemy. Considering the sizable portion of their faith that co-exists in American politics an outright demonization of our country over money would prove to be quite damaging to any military assets we have in the area. That would have serious ramifications that could take decades to repair, if at all.

Blind hate has to be taken out of the equation when considering the bigger picture here. We need them more than they need us and they have the political control to maintain the arrangement in their favor. There's nothing I can think of that could change it.

[–]Jesus 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

An alliance? More like an infiltration.

There's nothing I can think of that could change it.

You could withold funds, ban dual citizenship in the government and erradicate central banking based on permanent public debt.

[–]AnarchySpeach 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

infiltration

And make an enemy out of all of them... This seems more Pro-War than I'm comfortable with.

[–]Jesus 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Pro-war, that's anti-war. An isolationist policy would be beat and not fighting the Israeli governments Likudnik wars.

[–]AnarchySpeach 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Can't exactly remove their control without fighting them...