Do you still trust your eyes? 100% unreal picture of woman created by Google AI (Imagen)...

submitted by In-the-clouds from pbs.twimg.com

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]package 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

Not really accurate to say it's 100% unreal; AI systems like this are basically taking 100% real photos and blending between them semi-randomly to get the final image.

[–]ActuallyNot 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

I don't think that's what Imagen is doing.

There wouldn't be a lot of photos of "A very angry bird" or "Teddy bears swimming at the Olympics 400m Butterfly event" to blend between.

[–]christingboese 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

THAT IS TYPICAL TRANSGENDER LOGIC... IF IT IS AT LEAST 10% REAL, THEN IT IS REAL.

NO, IF IT IS 100% REAL THEN IT IS REAL.

BUT THIS IS THE NEW WORLD.. AND I AM SO GLAD THAT I AM NOT GOING TO BE A PART OF IT.

YOU JUST WAIT UNTIL THESE LITTLE FREAKS HAVE FUCKED UP EVERY ASPECT OF YOUR SOCIETY..

JUST WAIT..

YOU WILL LITERALLY BE EATING WORMS FOR BREAKFAST.

[–]In-the-clouds[S] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

I also wondered if I should say it's a 100% unreal picture.

If an artist paints on a canvas a woman without looking at a woman, but only uses his imagination based on all the women he has seen in his life, is it a true statement that the painting would be 100% not a photograph or picture but completely a painting, even though the man has seen countless photographs of women in his lifetime?

I think the AI is generating a completely new image based on a vast supply of images that the AI was trained on. The source of images could be the internet itself. This is a Google AI project, so they already have crawled most of the internet and could feed those images to their AI.

The woman does not exist. It is an image, but the pixels on your screen do not correspond to an actual, real human being. There is no unique soul, not even part of one, associated with this image, and I say it is a 100% unreal picture to distinguish it from an edited pre-existing picture.