Do you still trust your eyes? 100% unreal picture of woman created by Google AI (Imagen)...

submitted by In-the-clouds from pbs.twimg.com

all 39 comments
sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun

[–]LtGreenCo 11 insightful - 2 fun11 insightful - 1 fun12 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)

Her right (your left) arm looks... not right. The tattoo bleeds into strange territory. The white shoulder strap starts to blend into the skin a bit. And the hair doesn't quite cut it when you look at it closely. But at first glance it could definitely pass for a real photo. AI is getting scary.

[–]StillLessons 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Good spot on the arm. The machine didn't correctly put her tank top in back of the triceps.

Regarding the face, what's fascinating is this image is the perfect "advertising" face. The machine thinks like an advertising firm. This image is a perfect representation of the fakeness of the world we have been presented with for decades in advertising. The "reality" of real images is equally fake as the reality of this "manufactured" image. Very telling for what the "leaders" of society believe is the future. It's collapsing around them, but they really believe this kind of manufactured world can sustain itself. It cannot and it will not.

[–]IndianaJones 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Yeah something's definitely up with her right arm. It looks like there's another arm inside of it. I guess AI images are never perfect but this technology and this pic is still pretty impressive.

[–]brimshae 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Upper Echelon had a pretty good video about an AI artist program called Stable Diffusion the other day. Stuff really gets interesting (visually) after about the minute and a half mark or so. The first bits of art are somewhat samey. Yeezy through the years is also amusing.

Odysee link because fuck Youtube: https://odysee.com/@UpperEchelonGamers:3/artistic-revolution-is-here-ai-versus:e

[–]LarrySwinger2 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Plus there are colourless parts of her hair that don't look right, plus the cleavage is too low. And I'm not sure if the blink in her eye looks completely realistic either.

[–]CanisRex 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

is machine learning actual like traditional AI though? I think calling machine learning "artificial intelligence" is kind of a misnomer.

[–]IkeConn 6 insightful - 9 fun6 insightful - 8 fun7 insightful - 9 fun -  (0 children)

Will I trust my eyes? No. Will I look at the fake hot girls? Yes.

[–]NuclearBadger 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Looks more woman than trannies lol

[–]TwoGats 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Think thats creepy take a look at this. https://www.zerohedge.com/technology/digital-clones-deceased-loved-ones-chat-mourners-own-funerals

[–]Alienhunter 2 insightful - 4 fun2 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

Love it will have to use that in targeting political campaigns. "Grandma is always sad when you vote for "insert opposition to AI necromancy here".

[–]In-the-clouds[S] 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

We walk by faith, not by sight.

[–]IndianaJones 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

So they say it's impossible to imagine a new face. If you try to imagine a new face, it'll just be a random person's face that you've seen at some point, somewhere.

Out of the billions of women on earth, I wonder if at least one of them has the same face as this one.

[–]In-the-clouds[S] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

Wouldn't it be creepy if you found an AI-generated image, maybe used in an advertisement, that looked just like.... you?

[–]Alienhunter 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Nah eventually what marketing firms will do is glean your biometric data from Facebook photos and the like to insert an AI generated version of you into targeting advertisements.

"This could be you if you buy Gillette"

Picture of you surfing while juggling hot girls and simultaneously shooting at sharks with your AK-47.

[–]IndianaJones 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

It would make me feel important.

[–]soyboy77 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

I've seen better on https://thispersondoesnotexist.com/

[–]SMCAB 2 insightful - 5 fun2 insightful - 4 fun3 insightful - 5 fun -  (0 children)

Of course, she has blue hair.

[–][deleted] 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

We are no longer in uncanny valley. 😳

[–]package 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

Not really accurate to say it's 100% unreal; AI systems like this are basically taking 100% real photos and blending between them semi-randomly to get the final image.

[–]ActuallyNot 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

I don't think that's what Imagen is doing.

There wouldn't be a lot of photos of "A very angry bird" or "Teddy bears swimming at the Olympics 400m Butterfly event" to blend between.

[–]christingboese 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

THAT IS TYPICAL TRANSGENDER LOGIC... IF IT IS AT LEAST 10% REAL, THEN IT IS REAL.

NO, IF IT IS 100% REAL THEN IT IS REAL.

BUT THIS IS THE NEW WORLD.. AND I AM SO GLAD THAT I AM NOT GOING TO BE A PART OF IT.

YOU JUST WAIT UNTIL THESE LITTLE FREAKS HAVE FUCKED UP EVERY ASPECT OF YOUR SOCIETY..

JUST WAIT..

YOU WILL LITERALLY BE EATING WORMS FOR BREAKFAST.

[–]In-the-clouds[S] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

I also wondered if I should say it's a 100% unreal picture.

If an artist paints on a canvas a woman without looking at a woman, but only uses his imagination based on all the women he has seen in his life, is it a true statement that the painting would be 100% not a photograph or picture but completely a painting, even though the man has seen countless photographs of women in his lifetime?

I think the AI is generating a completely new image based on a vast supply of images that the AI was trained on. The source of images could be the internet itself. This is a Google AI project, so they already have crawled most of the internet and could feed those images to their AI.

The woman does not exist. It is an image, but the pixels on your screen do not correspond to an actual, real human being. There is no unique soul, not even part of one, associated with this image, and I say it is a 100% unreal picture to distinguish it from an edited pre-existing picture.

[–]John_Ross_Star 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

It's all about making hidden faces of demons, owls, etc. The odd arm is the giveaway - you just have to pick the right line to mirror from. https://imgur.com/a/IM72lmP "Search for Jehovah while he may yet be found."~bible

[–]In-the-clouds[S] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

You found a face that is not human using a clever trick of rotating and mirroring the original image.

But I appreciate more the quote you gave to seek Jehovah, the Lord God, our heavenly Father, who sent his son Jesus to redeem us from the curse. And at the name of Jesus, all must bow, including the demons.

Luke 10:17 And the seventy returned again with joy, saying, Lord, even the devils are subject unto us through thy name.

[–]raven9 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Why does she have puffy eyes, deformed arms and tatoos that look they were made out of cake frosting.

[–]JasonCarswell 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

I'd guess it seems there are blending and averaging algorithms with a huge base of actual images it draws from to morph and compile into "original" images. Clearly it doesn't know how to interpret, design, and apply tattoos, jewelry, or fashion beyond broad simple strokes. I wonder how many are messed up to get one "good" one - and I wonder how many source references are needed and how similar they are.

[–]CreditKnifeMan 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

I know that girl.

She had purple hair.

[–]The_Lear_Bluce_Ree 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Not hard to make a generic garbage person with a computer. She literally looks like every "unique free-thinker" in the past 15 years they just had to update the shitty tattoos.

[–]pyropulse 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

she looks off

[–]jingles 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (7 children)

it is entirely possible that when we watch the news that we are watching video that is AI generated.

it is possible that when we watch both trump and biden that we are watching cartoons that are AI generated.

it is entirely possible that we literally are living inside of a real matrix.

get ready to eat bugs for dinner.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uXEUW792etk

[–]trident765 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Technology used to be a means of sending information. But now you cannot trust what you see on technology, so we are losing this ability. If you wanted to prove something to someone 100 years ago you could show them a photograph. This is no longer the case. We have to start relying on our eyes and ears again, just like the 1700s.

[–]jingles 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

yeah, but you cant trust even your eyes and ears any longer... they flood the narrative with so much false information that the real information gets drowned out.

the only way to trust what you hear and see is to go into the middle of a forest, but then you are all alone.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Very true. It is entirely possible that you are a figment of a fags imagination.

[–]jingles 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

no, somehow i dont think so.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

It isn't beyond the realm of possibility.

[–][deleted]  (1 child)

[removed]

    [–]In-the-clouds[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    You would have to take the mark of the beast if you want to eat in the beast system, and then you would be 0wned, literally, by your adversary.

    AI was made by man, in his image. But man was made by God, in his image. We have a spirit, while AI does not. If you want mercy, do not turn to AI and the beast system, which Jesus warned us against. Jesus died and rose again, so we could overcome this world and be free.

    [–]Anman 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    Anyone who likes this is gay.