Systemic Hypocrisy

submitted by christnmusicreleases from pbs.twimg.com

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Questionable 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

English can not be your first language. And the meta narratives of United States politics are far outside your grasp.

[–]icedream 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

ight deluded. relativism is on the rise - no one has the courage the fight (because systemic pavlovian economic punishment)

yea english aren't my first, but that doesn't excuse your ad hominem argument to bash mine. what happens in the west was predicted by Pope Benedict with his "dictatorship of relativism". It's your liberalism that outlived its purpose.

[–]Questionable 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

That wasn't an Ad hominem argument, I was trying to tell you that you have no argument. It did not translate. In particular this section here:

"no one has the courage the fight (because systemic Pavlovian economic punishment)"

There is no central idea that I can grasp here, there is no ideology or political concept that I can read into that sentence.

This doesn't mean anything to me either:

"what happens in the west was predicted by Pope Benedict with his "dictatorship of relativism". It's your liberalism that outlived its purpose."

Something was predicted by someone. He had a dictatorship of relativism. My liberalism, which is a vague unspecified concept has somehow out lived something. None of this has inherent meaning. It is an interesting collection of words, but I have no clue what any of it is supposed to mean.

[–]icedream 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Something was predicted by someone. He had a dictatorship of relativism. My liberalism, which is a vague unspecified concept has somehow out lived something. None of this has inherent meaning. It is an interesting collection of words, but I have no clue what any of it is supposed to mean.

You need to learn to read man. At least read the "dictatorship of relativism" so you don't re-question me for the already-existing-concept : It's not like I made it up. The trait of relativism is as such: the lack of conservatism in USA, progressive is good but not to bet it all on that. Only if you see, it's okay now in USA (generally) then you don't need to address this issue. It's more severe than just 'systemic racialism', even if people are poor if they've clarity in mind, riots / chaz won't happen.

at least this is an outsider view.

[–]Questionable 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Knowing that 'dictatorship of relativism' is a concept, does not elevate it from the abstract disconnected statement that it is. It has about as much value to me as a collection of obscure acronyms strung together.

"then you don't need to address this issue."

I'm not addressing this issue. You've presented nothing here. It means nothing to me. This isn't a debate. I am rejecting everything that you have presented to me as irrelevant, and too abstract for consideration.

It's more severe than just 'systemic racialism', even if people are poor if they've clarity in mind, riots / chaz won't happen. at least this is an outsider view.

None of that means anything to me. Like Russia during the cold war, what is being presented to you abroad has nothing to do with real life in America. You are viewing the hyper realism that has been created to distract you from reality. You live inside a fake world.