all 44 comments

[–]Mnemonic 8 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 0 fun9 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

I was just going to post this, weird that you're the first one, it's been 7 hours already.

Terrible, probably (aacording to Sri Lanka officials) a terrorist organization that also last week demolished Buddhist statues.

I prefer reuters but it's a pretty old report with not much updates ATM.

[–]Jesus 8 insightful - 2 fun8 insightful - 1 fun9 insightful - 2 fun -  (7 children)

None of this is proof of anything but I thought it was interesting...

3 churches, 3 hotels reportedly attacked, with hundreds of casualties.

Reuters posts this measly 4-photo slideshow.

And wouldn’t you know it, 1 of the 4 is a photo of a damned shoe.

Studying past events like these, such as the fake brussels bombing, yes it was fake... Reuters and APnews always depict an obligatory one shoe photo. This is symbolic of a physical confirmation of a spoken deed or act”. “Now this was the manner in former time in Israel concerning redeeming and concerning changing, for to confirm all things.

The deed or act mentioned in this passage is meant to signify both the confirming of a contract, as well as the commitment to carry out the terms and conditions of that contract without fail. This symbolism, as far as Freemasons are concerned, is intended to express the sanctity of the contract made between yourself and the Lodge where you have taken your vows.

So someone decided to blow up a bunch of Catholic churches a few days after arguably the most famous Catholic church in the world “accidentally” burned?

Uh huh.

And somehow everything always fits perfectly into the previously established media narratives.

3 churches. 3 hotels.

And now 3 police officers.

[–]Cfootprints 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

Hi,Belgian here.

When you say the Brussels bombing was fake, what do you mean? Because it looked pretty damn real to me.

[–]cmdrrockawesome 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

The man is an avowed conspiracy theorist and thinks every major terrorist attack around the world is some form of government psyop. Don't pay him any mind.

[–]Jesus 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Not at all liar. Anyone telling someone else not to pay any mind to something is biased and likely suffering from denial or cognitive dissonance. I linked him the videos, he's open to watch them.

[–]Tom_Bombadil 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

The man is an avowed conspiracy theorist

Ha! Actually, he's an evidence theorist.

[–]hennaojisan 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Yes, he is obsessive about evidence and it checks out.

[–]Jesus 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Take a look at these videos, UK has a Begium series. Some are quite long and detailed but that's the point. His ability to decipher narratives, plot holes and anomalies is bar none the best I've seen. These are not videos telling you it is fake, they are well structured videos providing evidence that the official stories and timelines are laughable lies. Of course, there are many smoking guns that he discovers in his research and FOIA requests. Above all, do not listen to cmdrrockawesome. Watch the videos, and come to your own conclusion. Changing:Reality also had amazing videos on Brussels exposing G4S contracts and implausible narratives based on raw eyewitness footage. Most of it has been scrubbed.

Scrolldown to Brussels, watch the Lauderdale series, Orlando series, etc,.

An aspect of brussels could have been real, yes, but you'll realize they were conducting moulage drills at the same time with mock victims. Raw footage proved this from a hotel room. JUST watch UK's videos, and Changing:Reality. I believe that's his name.

[–]Tom_Bombadil 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (33 children)

This bomb exploded all of the ceiling tiles off of the roof, but left the stained glass windows on the second level intact?

You don't have to watch the video to see this. Just look carefully at the video still shot. Stained glass is extremely fragile. You can see the windows are unaffected.

Also, the paintings on the main floor are scorched, but the white walls of the room are unblemished.

The pews look like they were tossed around, but not exploded away from some blast epicenter.

It looks bogus.

Just saying...

Edit: many people probably were murdered in this attack. However, many of these events have recently been staged. The attack in New Zealand was demonstrably, a hoax.

Edit 2:. The Ceiling fans are bent down. Probably from dropping tiles off of the roof.

Also, they changed the photo image.

[–]Theo_Fridall 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (25 children)

1) Eight simultaneous bogus events?

2) How was NZ "demonstrably" a hoax? Can you demonstrate for me?

[–]Jesus 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (22 children)

Look up uk critical thinker fort lauderdale shooting videos. That single series, around 2hrs long will show how US and world wide drill psyops are conducted.

[–][deleted]  (14 children)


    [–]Jesus 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (10 children)

    Altaccount. /u/magnora7

    And, NZ probably was not a hoax, there are many anomalies though in the official timeline illustrating agency involvement.

    Calling someone a nutjob is a fallacy.

    [–][deleted]  (9 children)


      [–]hennaojisan 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (8 children)

      I wonder how the weather is in Tel Aviv today.

      [–][deleted]  (6 children)


        [–]magnora7 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

        What a disgusting piece of shit you are.

        Please respect the pyramid of debate on saidit, thank you.

        [–][deleted]  (2 children)


          [–]hennaojisan 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

          You were a star in debate class, weren't you?

          [–]Tom_Bombadil 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)


          [–]HopeThatHalps 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

          People who deny these tragedies happened can't emotionally deal with it. Their conspiracy theories save them from having to face the grim reality we live in.

          [–]Tom_Bombadil 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

          IUndeniable Proof: CGI Used in New Zealand Shooting (video link restored)


          Now let me first start out by saying that after thoroughly examining the 17 minute video of the shooter frame-by-frame, and after applying deductive reasoning in the forensic analysis, I am convinced this was a false-flag event for the following reasons:

          No bullet holes or shattered wood or glass or clouds of sheet rock or exploding plaster or cement can be observed or heard as the guns are firing into them and the victims. This is possible only when no solid projectile is fired from the muzzle, which means no solid bullets were fired into the walls, doors, windows, or victims bodies—only the concussion of air—which means either blanks or paint or gas or other non-solid projectiles were fired from the guns. This means, essentially, nothing solid impacted the victims bodies, therefore no physical damage resulted, which means no living person was lethally wounded or killed by an outside force. It’s simple physics, which Newton’s law establishes in the theorem: a body at rest stays at rest; a body in motion stays in motion unless acted upon by an outside force. Applied to this situation, we might similarly establish that a living body remains living unless impacted by an outside force that lethally disrupts the body’s life processes, such as a bullet destroying arteries and vital organs.
          No blood splatter from the close-range impact of the high-caliber bullets upon the victims can be observed anywhere on the walls, doors, floors or furniture. Several of the victims are shot at point-blank range as they are crawling or passing by the shooter, yet no visual impact of the bullets can be observed, which would have undoubtedly “kicked” or “thrown” the victim with tremendous force. Only one victim lying on the ground appears to have a red spray appear next to his head as he is allegedly shot, but this could be explained as a “paint round”, since no physical impact of the bullet or explosion upon the head is observed.
          Additionally, no pools of blood can be seen either around the bodies on the floor after being shot, except from one body which strangely appears lying next to the first victim in the doorway, which was not present when the shooter initially entered. So this suggests the body or actor was placed in that position, with blood added afterwards.

          Demonstrably a hoax.

          [–]FormosaOolong 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

          seriously scraping the bottom of the debate pyramid here, pal.

          [–]Tom_Bombadil 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

          UK critical thinker? Never heard of 'em...

          Cover me. I'm goin in!!!

          [–]Jesus 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

          He's great, watch Manchester on the face of it, doc. His videos are long and detailed. Anyone, even the sleeping could watch his investigative videos and attain a new perspective.

          [–]Tom_Bombadil 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

          He's really measured and thorough. I watched about 15 of his videos. I'm hooked.

          I found one particularly interesting video. I'll following up on referenced material.

          [–]Theo_Fridall 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

          Sure, will do. I love that stuff. that said, back to my question:

          How was NZ "demonstrably" a hoax? Can you demonstrate for me?

          [–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

          Oh, I can prove many events are and were hoaxes, however, I do not know if NZ was one.

          [–]Tom_Bombadil 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

          [–][deleted]  (1 child)


            [–]Jesus 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

            Yup, I'm starting to question if any of these events are truly real anymore. I know for sure Brussels was a hoax, this can be demonstrably proven through G4S contracts and hidden camera footage showing moulage, mock victims and even paraplegics playing parts. It was out in the open; overt for anybody who wanted to search and see, they could find it -- that is before the 1984 censorship fiasco. Indeed, that was and still is the desired solution. That they memorhole and scrub all raw videos depicting overt moulage fakery, i.e, event drill participants.

            They can create thousands of mock victims too, it is even written in the declassified Operation Northwoords DoD document. Hundreds of 'mock victims' and 'fake vigils/funerals' would be propagandized and televised to induce a desired social behavioral, socioeconomic or geopolitical agenda. That was in the 1960's, rest assured they have the will and tech to fake things at the 33rd degree -- pun intended, not sure if that is even a pun.

            So, the ONLY way to know for sure if these events are indeed real is to see all the footage, not just the manipulated OFFICIAL footage. Photos tell a thousand stories and yet the objective truth might be hidden elsewhere. Photos can be staged, so it is important to PIECE TOGETHER A NARRATIVE. Real events DO NOT HAVE FABRICATIONS AND GAPING PLOT-HOLES. For example, researching the Fort Lauderdale shooting we find the AGENDA overtly open in the future passing of legislation. This is the motive. The antithesis. To ALLOW open carry in airports is the bill soon to be signed; to be voted on in Florida, two days AFTER the alleged handgun shooting in a Fort Lauderdale Florida airport.

            Now for the gaping plot holes. The msnbc/CNN/FOX/local news photographers, videographers are AT THE SCENE as the shooting transpired. How is this possible? We have AP photos of the shooting as eyewitnesses scamble from the scene. The SAME AP photographers/so called journalists that just so happen to be at other world wide PSYOP events as they unfold. Frome Brussels to NICE, to Paris they are there capturing footage as the events unfold. How is this possible? How is it possible that media is at the scene filming scrambling witnesses as the shooting transpires? They, the media, do not seemed botherd by a lone gunman not even 100' away from where they are positioned. Their goal was ONLY TO CAPTURE FAKE TERROR acted out by drill participants. Now how do I know they were drill participants? Because the entire event that I just explained transpired in a different terminal a 1000 plus yards away from where officer Israel said it occured. That is, in an entirely different terminal not even connected to this one. If you do not research you would never know this. And even more hilarious is that the timeline makes even less sense as the shooter was captured at 1:30 but the media footage was live at around 2-2:25. And the DRILL PARTICIPANTS ALL SCREAMED, "He's shooting again!"

            How would they know this? They were not even in the same terminal, and he was supposedly already detained. Real narratives do not have contradicting plot holes, Drills, however, with the use of perception management do!

            Then you have santa clause guy doing al these interview on cnn saying how he was right near the shooter yet he was in a different terminal, closed off, most likely to conduct the drill. ANNNND he happened to be on an TLC tv show a year before, lol.

            And also research if medical injuries are legitimate with their stories. Injected drama will surely bring a more clearer conclusion, whether an event is real, narratives and timelines lineup or fake, they are conflicting and make zero sense. This was done by UK Critical thinker concerning the Brussels bombing and the drill becomes painfully obvious. They even were caught at Brussels using past terrorist footage as real footage for the Event.

            [–]Tom_Bombadil 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

            I agree with literally everything you stated. A previous link to the Boston attack was exceptionally detailed, and informative. I haven't been able to find it again, so it's probably disappeared.

            I've only begun to look into this hoax fakery within the past 6 couple of months, but i see it everywhere.

            The physics of the aftermath is my area of interest, as you can't fake physics.

            It's likely that many people were tragically murdered in this recent attack, in contrast to some other recent attacks. I don't think this was a hoax, in terms of casualties.
            I'm quite certain that this is a staged attack to continue to vilify Islam, and that they will be the ultimate victims.

            [–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

            I've been doing it since the early 2000's. Fakery and hoax PSYOPs have been utilized more frequently as of late.

            [–]Tom_Bombadil 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

            I learned and 9/11 truth a few years ago. The facts about the physics of the event were undeniable, however I had to see it all again for the first time.

            I avoided other conspiracies until about two years ago; literally Pandora's box.

            They're connected in so many ways that it's literally beyond belief.

            I'm an evidence theorist, so I go where the facts lead. Fortunately, the facts don't care what is believed.

            Fakery and hoax PSYOPs have been utilized more frequently as of late.

            We have the families of the 9/11 victims to thank for that. They relentlessly pressured the perpetrators, and didn't believe the govt lies.

            They forced the fakery and hoax PSYOPs to reduce their exposure by staying hoaxes.
            Hoaxes minimize legal repercussions. They can't be sued in the same way for a hoax. It's an issue of injury, damages, and legal standing.

            Third world countries like Sri Lanka don't pose the same legal liability. They have no legal reach.

            [–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

            Hey, there was an element of fakery and PSYOP on 9/11. You had Harley guy to thank. Claiming before anyone knew, that the towers fell BECAUSE the fire was just TOO damn hot and the structure couldn't hold itself up. Obviously, a plant on live TV and NOT a bystander. But you also had the Operation Northwoods fiasco on 9/11. There were indeed crisis actors on 9/11, for instance:


            [–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

            Exactly, it is legal for the US government and DoD to produce PSYOPs and Hoaxes on the American people. There are not many:

            legal repercussions

            ... no lawsuits, at least real ones.

            As opposed to actually commiting real false flag massacres.

            That being said they still conduct both and even before the legalization of propaganda and PSYOP's in 2012, they were still for hundreds of years conducting haoxes.

            I've also noticed that shills only come about if you expose fakery and PSYOPs. Our government is totally fine with you saying that they kill millions of people, which they do. But for some odd reason, they're NOT fine with you knowing that the MEDIA lies to you on the right or left. You have to pick a side and believe that side no matter what.

            [–]Tom_Bombadil 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

            They scurry around the shadows. If people realized that they were fooled by hoaxes, then the public would wake up and start questioning everything.

            The shills are the only effective method of pushing back against forums like this. I recall that "001" was one of the agressive shills that had something to say, so IMO 001's been discredited.

            A public tipping point will occur someday and when this happens people will be in the streets fighting back. They know it, and that's why the police are being militarized.

            [–][deleted]  (6 children)


              [–]Tom_Bombadil 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)

              A conveniently incriminating name.

              [–]Jesus 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

              They alway make the names scary

              [–]Tom_Bombadil 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

              Which suggest that they made the names...

              [–]hennaojisan 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

              I used to know three Mohamed Mohameds at my gym alone. It is really common but you are not necessarily wrong; just pointing out the truth.

              [–]Tom_Bombadil 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

              Oh... yeaaah..?


              I know.. like... Three... T-trillion!!! ;-)

              [–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

              I used to know Dr. Lube and Angle COLON from the Gay Night CLub Shooting too.

              [–]HopeThatHalps 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

              A lot has been made about how the coverage of this has been less intense than Christchurch, and people are saying it's because the perp(s) were not white guys, and that Muslim extremism has been swept under the rug, but the truth is that while Christchurch was live streamed, there's very on-the-groun media of this event, theres much less spectacle to this, despite the mugh higher death toll. I've seen several camera phone videos, and even though 300+ people died, I've only seen half a dozen actual dead bodies. Had these terrorists given their efforts the ISIS Hollywood treatment, it would have made a bigger splash in international media.

              [–]Black[S] 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (2 children)

              Reddit is just blatantly censoring it.

              [–]HopeThatHalps 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

              I think it's more likely the user base just doesn't care. They, and we, as a whole not exactly virtuous consumers of news.

              [–]hennaojisan 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

              IMO it was definitely a hoax but my question is: did this hoax have real dead bodies? I have been to Sri Lanka and around the island and can tell you it is not a place you just stumble into. So it is an island and the government has shut down all social media and very little reportage—lies or otherwise—is coming out of there. I think the latest figure was 290 dead. My point is that we know so little but still it smells like a hoax. "Past behavior is the best predictor of future or present behavior." — Dr. Phil :) . In the past, they lied, cheated and stole so...