you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]SoCo[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

Yeah, I've read the article and dozens more on the same topic, since Obama pulled his stunt. The article strait up lies by saying the Trump administration "undid those" those restrictions. The courts undid the illegal Obama Admin rule. It doesn't mean Obama's intentions weren't good, just they were not accomplished legally through democratic methods.

The water contamination that they are talking about happened between 1950 and the 1980's, where the military based poisoned its people, not really manufacturers. The article dishonestly makes it seem like water contamination is still happening, happened recently, and that factories poisoned military personnel, which isn't true.

This chemical is MASSIVELY regulated now. People who use it typically wear exposure cards. It is treated more strictly than nuclear materials ... to some degrees.

It is just an attempt to mislead the public, pander fake virtuousness, pretend to erase Trump actions, all while hurting Americans and driving prices up. People are much more submissive, when desperate and struggling.

[–]William_World 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

lol no you didn't Or why would you post an article that disproves your original point?

[–]SoCo[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

This article doesn't disprove "my point" at all, that is ridiculous.

My only point was adding a decade missing and misrepresented context to why this government action the article is describing is bad, doesn't help the environment, hurts the already crippled supply chain for critical needs, and is not even feasible. They would need to immediately make emergency exceptions as they learn of more stuff they forgot, when blanket-banning bad sounding things we already slammed with strict regulations. It would be like Biden full blanket-banning lead...now....having just learned leaded gas wasn't good for everyone.

[–]William_World 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

yes it does

always read your own links first

[–]SoCo[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

No, it doesn't. You seem to misunderstand the article and what I have said.

Have a nice day, but I'm not here to argue.

[–]William_World 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

true good point