Diet Coke sweetener could be declared as 'possibly carcinogenic'

submitted by [deleted] from dailymail.co.uk

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

It's interesting you select alcohol, why not mobile phones or products affected by glyphosate? It's really difficult to narrow down a study to remove all potential conflicts

[–]Evola 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Mobile phones don't emit radiation that is ionising as long as I know. For the most part the phones are bad for many reasons but I think our DNA doesn't need to worry about them.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Well, I was talking about things we consume physically.

[–]Vulptex 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Of course, let's all live in a bubble and do nothing but stare at it all our lives, because everything is going to kill us.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Then give us back sugar. They put aspartame in to reduce cost and boost their profits and reduce quality, while the consumer says "live a little, why so terrified of food". This attitude benefits nobody but the manufacturer.