Twelve-year-olds are being taught about anal sex in school while nine-year-olds are told to 'masturbate' for homework: The shocking lesson plans used by teachers in UK classrooms

submitted by [deleted] from dailymail.co.uk

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted] 6 insightful - 14 fun6 insightful - 13 fun7 insightful - 14 fun -  (5 children)

If I was told to masturbate for homework I would have gotten much better grades

[–]UncleJemima 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Moreover those lesson plans are for one class in a course for someone who is 16 or 17 or 18 in the UNITED KINGDOM, where one can see all of that and much more on TV (and online). UK TV after 9 pm has shows with nudity, discussions of sex, documentaries on prostitutes and professional BDSM people, and so much more. Movies in 'Freeview' TV are edited so that the bits where someone is shown at the moment of being killed are deleted, whereas the bits with boobs and other nudity remain in the movies. In the US it's the opposite - you watch people being murdered on TV, but no boobs. Anyhow: absolutely nothing shocking in OP's post, not if you live in the UK, and there are no crazy parents hijacking school boards. No one's worried about sex education in schools, unless they're Muslim, but there are also no complaints from Muslims.

[–]jet199 10 insightful - 1 fun10 insightful - 0 fun11 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Yeah, you are missing the point that kid's should not be learning about sexual technique in school. There's absolutely no need for that. The fact they can see this stuff elsewhere is normal for that age group and not in any way a reason why they should be teaching it in schools. So what is the why?

The facts behind this are that this approach has been pushed for years by peados like Tatchell who want kids groomed to be able to pleasure them as they would like. Rather than kids learning about their own and each other's bodies by having relationships and messing around, which is healthy and normal, they are being primed to serve adults. They are literally instilling that certain acts are standard and should be expected when in fact even among gay men there are a large number who never have anal sex for good reason.

[–]UncleJemima 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

kid's should not be learning about sexual technique in school.

Fair point - though I'm not sure that's literally what's happening. Perhaps schools texts should be less specific. When I read the sex education page in my biology text book long ago I don't recall anything more than very basic pictures explanations of fertilizaiton of an egg.

The facts behind this are that this approach has been pushed for years by peados like Tatchell who want kids groomed to be able to pleasure them as they would like.

OK - ya lost me. I've not seen any evidence of this. If the Daily Fail could show this I'm sure they'd be happy to run it on the front page. Perhaps there's a secret group devoted to including in school textbooks advice on grooming kids to serve adults and we'll see news of that next week. Sorry, I just haven't seen that level of insanity.

2 problems: perhaps school texts should not be that explicit, though let's be honest that the recent movement against education, schools, teachers, kids, books, libraries &c is POLITICAL, part of a fascist playbook reminiscent of 1930s Germany, and a trend intended to help right-wing politicians get elected. That's more obvious than the assumption that kids are reading sections of 'The Joy of Sex' in school.

[–][deleted] 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

where one can see all of that and much more on TV (and online)

Yeah, I'm with you on this. Kids have cell phones, Pornhub doesn't check your government ID yet, I don't think kiddos are going to school libraries to look for smut. I have no problem with sex-ed anyway, I just don't want them teaching kids non-scientific gender ideology in the curriculum, but if they wanna put gender whacko books in the library that is perfectly fine with me.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

👎