Biden was 'complicit in alleged white collar crimes' watchdog claims. A 2016 email shows the then VP's senior advisor sent a schedule for his call with then-Ukrainian president Poroshenko - and copied Hunter in the message, a use of nonpublic information from a government job for financial gain.

submitted by Chipit from dailymail.co.uk

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Chipit[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

Oh look, it's the paid poster jumping in to defend the powerful. Again.

When Hunter Biden is being appointed to the board of powerful companies like Ukraine's energy giant Burisma, it's everyone's problem.

Ask yourself, if Trump's son's laptop was found with all sorts of incriminating evidence on it, would the attorney general have refused to prosecute?

[–]Site_rly_sux 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Trump's son's laptop was found with all sorts of incriminating evidence on it

Dude when writing this post title you decided that the strongest point you could make, was Hunter was told that VP Biden would be spending 15 minutes preparing for a phone call.

That's not incriminating. And that was literally the very best you thought you could accomplish.

So don't give us that "incriminating evidence" crap. You found out that Hunter was told that Biden wouldn't be available at 8.45 tomorrow morning. That's not incriminating and it's not evidence. But it was the very best you felt you were capable of.

So maybe come back later when you actually have something incriminating to show us, dipshit

[–]Chipit[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Why would anyone write a lawyerly defense for powerful people unless they were being paid to do it? There is zero motivation.

[–]Site_rly_sux 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Why would anyone chose not to believe that there's a teapot in orbit of mars unless they're being paid not to believe it? There's zero motivation to not believe that there's a teapot around mars. Why would someone chose that? You'd have to be crazy or a shill.

a lawyerly defense

Defense against what, chipit?

It's true that Biden told his son he'd be busy from 8.45 to 9, preparing for a call with the chocolatier.

That seems to be true, I'm not obfuscating that.

I just don't understand what you believe is wrong about it

[–]Chipit[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

You're defending the powerful. Stop it.

Instead, come to our side. The side of the little guy. Be a hero instead of a villain lackey.

[–]Site_rly_sux 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Ok so heroes think that it was wrong for the VP to tell his son that he'd be busy between 8.45 and 9am. Is that your theory of the heroic? Heroism, to chipit, is when parents are secretive about their morning plans