Trump promises to ban transgender women from sports if re-elected

submitted by soundsituation from nbcnews.com

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Gre 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

He is not trying to get re elected. This is some sort of scam he is running.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

I feel you.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

people said back in 2016 he wasn't really trying to win but he did. I bet he does run and win again. But yeah then doesn't do his campaign promises again.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

So far all he was able to do, issteal code, which was exposed very fast.

So i'cant follow your point. For me he is just the crooked, fuckedup groomer he is. Not a president in any way. Like he never should have been. But at this point in time a lot of cards were played. You can't repeat bs luck, Imo.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

back in 2016 any repub would have beaten hillary, despite what the media lied with their polls said of course. Not luck. Now covid stopped trump and let biden win in 2020 but biden and dems are very unpopular now due to covid continuing. Any repub will beat Biden in 2024, and Trump is still most popular repub so it is likely to be him now of course things can change since then like he might have a heart attack due to being old. Then DeSantis wins instead. But barring unforseen circumstances it's trump.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Like I said: you can't repeat bs luck. Otherwise I agree with one or two of your points.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

but like I said it wasn't luck

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I know. So what's your point?

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

oh ok, good then