George Floyd's family will receive $27 million settlement

submitted by Nemacolin from theweek.com

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Node 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (9 children)

COVID19 is of course a hoax

It's hard to believe you accept any aspect of reality, but this must be a 'once in a lifetime' event.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

Would be interesting to know which resources have brainwashed Saiditors into believing COVID19 is a hoax. What kind of 'reality' is developed at those resources, where science and facts are so easily refuted? Care to name any of the resources you've read or watched that helped you think COVID19 is a hoax?

[–]Node 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

No, it's not for me to do people's job for them. People deserve to create their own consequences in life.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

So if I search for - COVID19 is a hoax - I will find your resources?

Only a handful of crazy alt-right propaganda sites will note this, and they have absolutely no credibility. So unless you have a better resource, you've got nothing reliable.

[–]Node 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

You mean search with one of the tech sites owned by associates of the people putting the hoax on? No, of course not.

But you know this already.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Consider the facts or not. Up to you.

[–]Node 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Yup, definitely prefer the facts over fake 'official narratives'. You've seen the facts as well, as they're even posted on a site as close to the mainstream as saidit. You're too intelligent to believe the medical advice from politicians and their paid operatives over the warnings from doctors and other medical professionals.

I know you can't publicly acknowledge an interest in the catastrophe cycle, but for your own personal consumption, here are a couple channels that focus on the science of what's happening. They don't say much or anything about the response of 'our overlords' to this upcoming event, but it helps explain the crazy political stuff that's been happening. Remember the poles had already gone into drift mode when the 1859 Carrington event hit... This has been coming on for a long time. Ever wondered what those missing trillion$ are being spent on?

Oppenheimer Ranch Project - https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC6VhLE7qAeW8NZm6PsXGGrQ

Suspicious0bservers - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aHBDF_3Dk_k

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Thanks for these links, of which I was unaware. I've watched the video by Ben & Kat Davidson, have looked at their version and other versions of catastrophisim, and I am thinking of getting their book. I'll have a closer look at the Oppenheimer Ranch Projects. The Davidsons's are very interesting, for the ways in which they discuss astrophysics and geophysics, but what they propose is essentially unpredictable, given the time frames in which these catastrophies occur. I'd rather read about it than see a video with quick images of research articles. I see that the Davidson's have a large following, with 65,000 views of the recent video, and 10,000 votes, thanks especially to the many people they've met while on the road. If you know the answer one or both of these questions, please let me know:

Do the Davidson's offer a potential date or period for the "next end of the world"?

Does their version of catastrophism argue against studies of man-made contributions to global climage change?

[–]Node 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Roughly yes, and yes. Watch the last few daily update vids, which are very short. Might be in todays or yesterdays update video. Maybe back a couple days.

The good news is that the video is just to introduce the links to the papers. See the description below the videos for the links to read the mentioned papers.

studies of man-made contributions to global climage change

They particularly highlight the studies that incorporate the new data and modeling, but Ben does sometimes point out the stick in the muds who still live in the past.

Just checked in my book. Here's a quote from the last page of their 115 page paperback (The next end of the world), that followed the textbook.

Earth's magnetic field will decrease to the point where modern society breaks down between 2030 and 2050.

I think he's moved that date up a little, based on the most recent accelerating spin data. It's really interesting to watch this evolving, but I kind of hope he's totally full of shit. I've almost died, and am now living in a sort of 'bonus round', but having our planet being seared of most life is inexplicably more frightening than my individual death. Weird, huh?

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Yes - all very interesting. I might get the book, just out of curiosity. Even if the science (ie. inherent unpredictability for geologic and astromic events) will not support that date range (2030-50), the way that the argument is developed with scientific studies helps people understand relationships between geological and astronomical developments. And the lives of these massive systems hopefully remind people of the importance of each day of their own lives, but who knows. I think people who take the time to think about this benefit from it.