2 boys raped & buried alive in cemetery left ‘covered in blood’ after escape

submitted by Canbot from thesun.co.uk

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]bobbobbybob 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (3 children)

yes, Tom, I understand fake news. I've also dug a lot of holes, and there is nothing that makes that hole look very old. The lack of dirt is unremarkable with the knowledge that it was the site of a forensic examination, and when you dig in heavy clay soil like that it very very quickly assumes a flat and undisturbed appearance. Just outside, I have a pile of clay that I dug out of a large hole to make foundations for a dog shelter, and it looked just like that picture immediately after I excavated it, although I had a much neater hole because I wasn't scared shitless when I dug it.

Your default position is "its all fake". Which is tedious as fuck, by the way.

So whatever you look at, you look for 'proof' of your default position, then run around bleating it once your bias is confirmed.

My default position is "I don't trust what they say", so I look at the gestalt of events for a sense of truth, or a sense of lie. This binary sense is something i've spent years on, and i'm not a human lie detector, my autism tunes to such an extent that I'm pretty smug about it.

In this particular case, the story seems true, although I believe the boys went there for sex, and they are hiding that aspect of the tale.

But they picked the wrong swarthy fuckbois and ended up being degraded and punished by closet homo islamic psychopaths instead.

[–]Tom_Bombadil 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Your default position is "its all fake". Which is tedious as fuck, by the way.

The swedish Muslims are evil trope is tedious as fuck.
Where are the norwegian reports?
Or Finnish reports?

The Muslim boogeyman in Sweden is the popular media PsyOp.

There are similar examples in recent swedish history.

Are you familiar with the state run grenade terror operation in Sweden?

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_grenade_attacks_in_Sweden

The hand grenades found by the police are exclusively the ex-Yugoslavian M75 hand grenade.[21]

A former communist country's grenades from the 90's (at best)???

The ideal Gladio style terror device.

No one is injured in +90% of them, but they seemingly disappeared in 2020?

Naturally, there were some swedes who claimed that middle eastern migrants would have easy access to 90's era communist hand grenades.
No evidence was provided to substantiate this, but that's the nature of propaganda.

Far-right political activists spreading anti-immigrant sentiments have attributed the rise in grenade attacks and crime with the migrant crisis, a claim that has been disputed.[11][12][13] Paulina Neuding of The Spectator wrote that Swedish officials have failed to effectively address the problem: "it’s still hard for Swedish authorities to be frank about what’s going on. It’s widely known that gang members are mainly first- and second-generation immigrants."

False flag AF.

My guess is they ran out of Yugoslavian grenades, so that was no longer an option.

They weren't interested in using NATO grenades because it's self incriminating.

Using Russian grenades wasn't an option like it would have been during the cold war, because the Russians would investigate, and probably prove it was the swedish police all along.

They're probably fresh out of untraceable grenades...

So now they're blaming nameless menacing Muslims, armed with knives, and shovels, who are hiding in parks, with digitized faces.

So, yeah. That's a stupid story, and I think it's nonsense.

So whatever you look at, you look for 'proof' of your default position

Shouldn't this be the critical thinker default position? Looking for actual evidence, instead of a prepackaged narrative.

then run around bleating it once your bias is confirmed.

Bias towards evidence.

It would be great if others would join in.

Additional critical thinking should always be welcome. IMHO.

Am I mistaken?

I'm not singling you out, because i think you're stupid.

I'm singling you out because you aren't stupid, and I highly doubt you would be fooled by most of this if you too the time to carefully evening the evidence.

The lack of dirt is unremarkable with the knowledge that it was the site of a forensic examination, and when you dig in heavy clay soil like that it very very quickly assumes a flat and undisturbed appearance.

Really?

Do you have any photos of an undisturbed blend pile of heavy clay?

[–]bobbobbybob 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

The swedish Muslims are evil trope is tedious as fuck.

No one is expressing that trope here. The guys charged were well known for being utter cunts.

The Muslim boogeyman in Sweden is the popular media PsyOp.

No, it isn't. It took years before the actual situation in Sweden leaked out, and the mainstream press has only started mentioning it in the last couple of years. The real situation is well documented by alternative media, and it is bad. But keep defending the muslims, I see you have a hard on for sharia.

False flag AF.

Everytime a islamic cunt is a cunt, its the zionists, I get it, you are a fucking muzzie lover.

So, yeah. That's a stupid story,

the idea that muslims obey the teachings of their crazy faith is so outlandish that you'll construct a full blown insane conspiracy rather than acknowledge the truth, that islam is a violent, rapist, murderous, lying cult that has, for 1600 years, been following EXACTLY THE SAME PATTERN of invasion, murder, rape and mayhem. Yes, there are some 'nice' muslims. But the holy books are clear. they are 'bad muslims'.

So whatever you look at, you look for 'proof' of your default position

Shouldn't this be the critical thinker default position?

NO. it is called 'confirmation bias'. You look for evidence to support your fantasy, and so ignore anything that doesn't fit it, grasping at any evidence to support your beliefs. You are no different to /u/jesus with his 'zionists are under my bed' fantasy.

Do you have any photos of an undisturbed blend pile of heavy clay?

I have no way to share photos anonymously, but the photo in the article is pretty much spot on. But, why don't you go and dig a hole yourself, learn how it works. You are the one that made a claim about the hole / dirt, but you have no experience of what such a hole looks like, you are fantasising/ making baseless claims. Go educate yourself.

But since I know you won't, here's a video. watch what happens to the soil under his feet. Absolutely matches the article, and you can see where they were on their knees, the compaction from that, and the line of little grains spreading backwards from where they were throwing the excavated soil. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o9FuFIY-OKA

also, watch the way the damp clay squishes here: https://youtu.be/ORq_bzx8cY8?t=428

[–]Jesus 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Alciaduh was created by who? Sure, Jihadists can be terrible. Being Muslim or Jewish is anti-Christ but at least muslims venerate Christ whereas Jews despise it.

The open borders policy is a Zionist goal after all.