all 9 comments

[–]Chipit 5 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 3 fun -  (3 children)

What was William Alexander's username?

Or is this just an ad hominem smear? As is explicitly forbidden by the Pyramid of Debate?

[–]Tom_Bombadil 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

We know it wasn't Snow.

[–]FediNetizen 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Saidit users when you make fun of Reddit users

"Lol, yeah, redditors sucks"

Saidit users when you make fun of Saidit users

"This is slander! This is a smear! Ad hominem! Stop making fun of us, it's against the rules!"

You really can't handle criticism, can you? Y'all really are a bunch of snowflakes.

[–]Chipit 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

No, literally ad hominems are against site rules.

This isn't criticism. It makes no arguments. It's just a slur by an actual snowflake.

[–][deleted] 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

careful, looks like slander

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

What can we learn here ? Threatening is quite ineffective as a https://saidit.net/s/Tactics/ most of the times. Because most people won't budge so easily. I think even the opposite is true especially when directed against organizations: It forces a reaction.

I keep it with Yoda: Either you do or you don't. There is no try.

But since implementing this requires some persistence and MSM and apps try to nudge our attention span to 30 sec. at max it gets harder and harder to actually behave like this for more and more people.

[–]RuckFeddit 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

What was their username?

[–]FediNetizen 7 insightful - 5 fun7 insightful - 4 fun8 insightful - 5 fun -  (1 child)

It's a joke, dude. It's a play on the fact that there are a lot of raging anti-semites on here.

[–]Penelope 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

You're engaging in an ad hominem. Please use non-slanderous descriptions next time.