Supreme Court: Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg Has Died

submitted by UnexpectedTransmissi from (breitbart.com)

all 87 comments
sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun

[–]FediNetizen 16 insightful - 6 fun16 insightful - 5 fun17 insightful - 6 fun -  (48 children)

Well that's huge. I'm betting money Republicans rush a candidate through before January even though it makes them massive hypocrites when you consider how they treated this situation during 2016.

[–]Druullus 14 insightful - 3 fun14 insightful - 2 fun15 insightful - 3 fun -  (8 children)

It was a Democrat rule. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Merrick_Garland_Supreme_Court_nomination#Supposed_%22Biden_rule%22_debate

[–]FediNetizen 5 insightful - 4 fun5 insightful - 3 fun6 insightful - 4 fun -  (1 child)

So you would think it would be outrageous they appointed a new candidate, right?

[–]Druullus 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

what?

[–]jjdub7 3 insightful - 4 fun3 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 4 fun -  (1 child)

Thanks for the gold kind stranger!

[–]HegeMoney 5 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Ha!

I haven't read that for a while, and I haven't missed it.

[–]SaidOverRed 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Thank you! /meme

The sad part is that they can't just rewind the clock and unpoliticize the courts because then the left will just do what they did before.

[–]JasonCarswell 1 insightful - 3 fun1 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 3 fun -  (2 children)

Merrick covered up the Oklahoma City bombing.

[–]Druullus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

and?

[–]JasonCarswell 1 insightful - 3 fun1 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Just adding info for those who didn't know.

Both the Left and the Right are scum and whoever they pick as a replacement will be scum.

[–]jjdub7 8 insightful - 5 fun8 insightful - 4 fun9 insightful - 5 fun -  (32 children)

Not at all. The Senate calls the shots. GOP has controlled the Senate both times. The rules are written in plain English. Political opponents aren't just supposed to roll over and die just because Dem strategy leaders are incompetent establishment-crony morons. Screaming "massive hypocrites" when you know damn well Dems would make the same move if the roles were reversed.

You just don't like losing.

[–]just_lesbian_things 8 insightful - 3 fun8 insightful - 2 fun9 insightful - 3 fun -  (31 children)

You just don't like losing.

Or we just don't like hypocrisy. I'd be screaming "massive hypocrites" if the positions were reversed, but right now they're not.

"You would do it too" is a race to the bottom. Since when was America about being just as shitty as you think your opponent might be?

[–]meatball4u 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun -  (23 children)

Since when? Since media and academia got taken over by an ethnic minority that thinks they're the Chosen People and have never trusted whites. Popular culture and education is controlled by people operating in bad faith, time to act accordingly

[–]FediNetizen 6 insightful - 4 fun6 insightful - 3 fun7 insightful - 4 fun -  (5 children)

Oh look, another racist Saidit user blaming problems on race.

"When the only tool you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail"

[–]meatball4u 7 insightful - 4 fun7 insightful - 3 fun8 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

It might surprise you I never thought I'd ever hold these positions in my lifetime. Funny thing that education and overcoming censorship can change even the most seemingly solid positions. Truth is often bitter, you can recoil at the taste but it's best to consume it as often as possible

[–]Jesus 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

Jews are not a race.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 3 fun1 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 3 fun -  (2 children)

Of course they are.

[–]Jesus 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

It's a religion with different sects, some radically fundementaliat and supremacist, it's also an ethno-nationalist idenity when need be and a tradition/culture, albeit, anti-Christ.

Judaism is NOT a race period.

[–]JasonCarswell 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

No, they're not, though they may claim to be for victimhood and/or privilege - whichever helps them.

[–]just_lesbian_things 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (16 children)

Since media and academia got taken over by an ethnic minority that thinks they're the Chosen People and have never trusted whites.

And when did that happen? As in, actual years, or at least give me the decade.

Popular culture and education is controlled by people operating in bad faith, time to act accordingly

What's the end game? Burning your country to the ground?

[–]JasonCarswell 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (7 children)

Hollywood has always been controlled by Jews/Zionists. They've also had a firm grip on academia since The Venitians at least. Check out Webster Tarpley on that history, though you can ignore his modern day analysis.

Ask yourself this: What country that has undergone serious and profound change that was not for the better and had their citizens volunteer for that to happen? Answer: None. From the fall of the Berlin Wall and Russia to any other situation around the world - those citizens did not want collapse - but it was forced upon them by their "leaders".

The current global crisis is completely manufactured and engineered to favour the ruling class only and to grant them more wealth and power in reward for fucking shit up well beyond mere stupidity. They make the chaos and the masses give them more power to fix their chaos and oppress us all more with their "solutions".

[–]Jesus 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

Not always. The Catholics for a time controlled Hollywood and censored all kinds of degeneracy but in the end they lost to the Jews. Hollywood is majority owned by Jews; mostly atheistical but so to religious and Zionist.

[–]JasonCarswell 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

While I'll admit that there were certainly battles for control, I wouldn't say there was ever a switch so much as a compromise for a few decades.

From the beginning Jews ran major studios in Hollywood from Laemmle to Zukor to the Warners in Warner Brothers to the Loew, Goldwyn, and Mayer in Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Major_film_studios#History

Hollywoodism: Jews, Movies and the American Dream (1998) documentary IMDb 7.1/10

[–]Jesus 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

I wouldn't say there was ever a switch so much as a compromise for a few decades.

Yes, better stated.

[–]Jesus 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

From the fall of the Berlin Wall and Russia to any other situation - the citizens did not want collapse - but it was forced upon them by their "leaders".

They collapse it just enough to buy up assets by the pennies and make the lives of the common citizens miserable and then provide them with their pre-planned solution.

[–]JasonCarswell 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Yes. Thanks for the clarification wrapped up with an explanitory bow.

[–]just_lesbian_things 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Hollywood has always been controlled by Jews/Zionists. They've also had a firm grip on academia since The Venitians at least. Check out Webster Tarpley on that history, though you can ignore his modern day analysis

Spare me the conspiracy bullshit. Give me a number. A year or a decade. 1980s? 1930s?

[–]JasonCarswell 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It's not conspiracy bullshit.

Do your own homework and answer your own questions.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Major_film_studios#History

[–]meatball4u 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (7 children)

It really started as a result of WWII and trying not to look like anything resembling a Nazi by instituting Jewish quotas in the Ivy league. It increased further as a result of the 1960's cultural upheaval. This article goes into exhaustive detail about Jewish overreach in academia https://www.unz.com/runz/the-myth-of-american-meritocracy/

"The Jewish levels for Yale and Columbia were also around 25 percent, while white Gentiles were 22 percent at the former and just 15 percent at the latter. The remainder of the Ivy League followed this same general pattern.This overrepresentation of Jews is really quite extraordinary, since the group currently constitutes just 2.1 percent of the general population and about 1.8 percent of college-age Americans."

Part of this has to do with Jewish intelligence, which is significantly greater on average than that of Europeans. But Jewish power in both finance and politics dictates what does and doesn't get taught at universities. One of the most obvious effects of this is the wildly disproportionate number of leftist and left leaning professors compared to rightist or right leaning ones 12 to 1 https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/oct/6/liberal-professors-outnumber-conservatives-12-1/

What's the end game? Hopefully free speech serves its purpose in waking people up in the face of the left's racism and egalitarianism. If that doesn't work, then balkanization is probably all that's left

[–]just_lesbian_things 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

It really started as a result of WWII and trying not to look like anything resembling a Nazi by instituting Jewish quotas in the Ivy league. It increased further as a result of the 1960's cultural upheaval.

So you're saying that Jewish people did not start taking over media and academia until 1939-1945? Am I getting this right?

Hopefully free speech serves its purpose in waking people up in the face of the left's racism and egalitarianism.

Racism... against non-jewish people? Because Jewish people are overrepresented in academia? Is this correct?

the wildly disproportionate number of leftist and left leaning professors compared to rightist or right leaning ones 12 to 1

Universities are leftist in the US because the American left is more liberal and universities are more liberal. Universities are more liberal because the act of inquiry, research, and learning requires openness to new experiences, which is characterized by liberalism.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

act of inquiry, research, and learning requires openness to new experiences, which is characterized by liberalism.

In theory yes but in practice left leaning "thinkers" are completely dictatorial.

[–]JasonCarswell 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Both of you are correct - it's neither all one nor the other.

There is liberal exploration AND there is communist-totalitarianism WITH much grey between.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

There is liberal exploration AND there is communist-totalitarianism WITH much grey between.

Yes in theory. Much like the original meaning of liberal was libertarian but now isn't. Anyone who is a liberal today is not advancing freedom they are advancing tyranny. I'm quite aware that many liberals don't think that but that's a fault of education and learning on their part.

[–]JasonCarswell 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

Depends what their precise end game actually is. Sure more power, etc - is general. Cutting up the nation with civil war? Possibly - and it seems like they're aiming for that. However, Balkanization is certainly not all that's left. The totalitarian MIAC-corpra-technocracy will stop at nothing. They have countless ways to dispose of fringe elements - if it comes to that. How much do they want? All of it. How much do they actually need? Enough for complete control for the forseeable future.

[–]meatball4u 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

MIAC?

[–]JasonCarswell 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Eisenhower's "Military Industrial Complex" was originally going to be the "Military Industrial Academic Complex" but they not only thought it was too long a phrase, but they also didn't want to show their entire hand. I forget where I learned that, about half a year ago.

[–]insta 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (6 children)

"You would do it too" is a race to the bottom.

It's closer to Machiavellian than anything. It's simply political realism.

Or we just don't like hypocrisy.

I would argue it's not hypocrisy and simply McConnell was lying back when he used the election as an excuse. Not that it's much better but anyone with two brain cells to rub together knew the real reason no judge was nominated.

[–]just_lesbian_things 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

Machiavellian than anything. It's simply political realism.

I would argue it's not hypocrisy and simply McConnell was lying back when he used the election as an excuse.

Ah, ok, so he's not holding this administration to different principles than the last one, he's just a completely immoral, lying piece of shit. You can't have double standards if you don't have any standards. No, you're wrong, this is a lot worse. You think things are always this bad, but they weren't. Keep this up and you'll really learn what it's like to live in a corrupt shit hole.

[–]insta 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

he's just a completely immoral, lying piece of shit.

Chad meme: YES

Keep this up and you'll really learn what it's like to live in a corrupt shit hole.

Again, I'm not saying it's not wrong but it was very clear McConnell was just lying last time and was not hearing the appointee out of political power move. That's why I don't really view it as "hypocritical", rather than he was just flat up lying before.

If you believed McConnell at his word about "giving the people a voice in choosing the supreme court appointee" than you're just a child. I don't know what else to say.

[–]just_lesbian_things 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

I believe in trying to hold politicians accountable for their word, and voting them out via democratic process if they underperform. You've downgraded him from a hypocrite to a lying piece of shit. I daresay he's unsalvageable at this point.

[–]JasonCarswell 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

It's closer to Machiavellian than anything.

True! Globalist Zionist NeoCon Machiavellianism.

I would argue they use every scam in the book: manipulation, deception, lies, hypocrisy, propaganda, etc.

[–]insta 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Globalist Zionist NeoCon

But you repeat yourself.

[–]JasonCarswell 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Yes, all 4 words are synonyms. It's to be extra clear for the readers.

[–]insta 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)

even though it makes them massive hypocrites

Meh, makes them more like liars. Everyone knew the real reason they blocked the appointee and the opposite side would've done the exact same. I get it's faux pas to be a realist but the actual motives were obvious to anyone with two brain cells to rub together.

[–]jjdub7 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

They don't need any reason to block. You need both the White House and Senate to appoint and confirm. The laws are written in plain English.

[–]insta 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

They don't need any reason to block.

Yeah, which made the whole lying thing super stupid. I get that they couldn't blatantly come off as "Nah, we own the Senate so who cares" but that's what it was. If they didn't lie about it back then it wouldn't look so bad right now.

[–]jjdub7 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I agree, they shoul have just outright come out and said 'hell no', but remember how surreally different the political climate seemed, looking back from 2020 here? like when Joe Wilson's "You lie!" outburst was a huge scandal?

[–]insta 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

like when Joe Wilson's "You lie!" outburst was a huge scandal?

Yeah, I think Obama's second term kinda sent the right-wing off into a weird mood and kinda went off their rocker.

But then when Trump was elected the left-wing fucking melted down. The left went from the party of ScienceTM to believing in Alex Jones-level of conspiracy theories about Russia.

[–]LaxSagacity 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

The Dem's also chose to roll over on it because they assumed Hillary would win and so thought they could make it an election issue in their favour. The lesson from 2016 is not to do what they did.

[–]Lostcarkeys 9 insightful - 2 fun9 insightful - 1 fun10 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

It's about time.

Now we had better get another judge confirmed.

[–][deleted] 9 insightful - 4 fun9 insightful - 3 fun10 insightful - 4 fun -  (3 children)

Shit, we got President Donny or Creepy Ass Biden picking a new supreme court Justice, this ain't gonna end well either way. Nobody wins here.

[–]JasonCarswell 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

Nobody wins here.

[–]Jesus 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

Israel does and the Chabadniks do.

[–]JasonCarswell 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

The 0.00001% win. (Prolly less than that.)

[–]UnexpectedTransmissi[S] 7 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

I think we want to avoid a 4-4 supreme court decision from an undecided election.

[–]SaidOverRed 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Oh no... you're right.

[–]RedPillDessert 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

4-4 better than a democratic SC decision win surely?

[–]JasonCarswell 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

It's all part of the intentional destruction of the election process, de-legitimizing the presidency, collapsing of the economy, etc. so ((("they"))) can roll in with inflated totalitarian powers to deal with the chaos they created.

[–]meatball4u 6 insightful - 3 fun6 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 3 fun -  (4 children)

Dems are already threatening to increase the number of justices to 11 or 13 if they get power. The end of America is approaching

[–]SaidOverRed 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Even leftists know that was beyond the pale with the American Dictator (FDR) threatened that before. But, having watched Joy Blowhard from the view claim her blackface (the worst sin evarr) was okay, I suppose they are beyond caring about hypocrisy.

[–]jjdub7 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Joy is so egregious. Especially screaming "The black community has my back" at Klacik. A life-shattering cancellation for anyone right of Stalin, yeah crickets from the outrage mob. "Authentic" voices, my ass.

[–]JasonCarswell 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

The end of America is

a perpetual dream, like boiling frogs, sometimes with big leaps of faith like 9-11 or COVID.

[–]Extract 5 insightful - 5 fun5 insightful - 4 fun6 insightful - 5 fun -  (0 children)

Guess who's voting by mail this election...

[–]Nemacolin 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

How horrible. What a sad development.

[–]Nemacolin 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (20 children)

Well, there is balance in the universe. The Democrats will repay in the same coin.

"Paybacks are a bitch."

[–]Druullus 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

repay?

[–]Nemacolin 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

Yep. What the Republicans do now will be repaid in time, and probably with interest.

[–]Druullus 1 insightful - 3 fun1 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

Democrats will excel at doing their jobs in the future?

[–]Nemacolin 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Like I said; make your bets and wait for the wheel to fully stop before reaching for your winnings.

[–]sproketboy 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (6 children)

Democrats are not going to win elections for 20 years.

[–]Nemacolin 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Lay down your money and place your bet. We will see.

[–]insta 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

Texas will flip blue within 20 years. Florida even sooner.

[–]sproketboy 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

Texas will be putting lefties in the oven within 20 years. All good.

[–]insta 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

Nice troll.

Ted Cruz only won Texas by 51% vs 48% back in 2018. Ted Cruz is a household-name Republican. That state is slipping and fast. It'll be fine for 2020, but 2028 is seriously questionable; if you disagree you're simply not paying attention.

[–]sproketboy 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Texas will be putting lefties in the oven within 1 year. All good.

[–]JasonCarswell 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (8 children)

Ginsburg on her deathbed, "COVID is a bitch."

[–]Nemacolin 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (7 children)

I doubt that.

[–]JasonCarswell 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (6 children)

I jest.

[–]Nemacolin 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)

Why?

[–]JasonCarswell 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

Fuck all the SCOTUS. Why just 1 SCOTUS? Why not have several Supreme Courts, just like there are several courts in City Hall? Then they could process things faster, better, fairer. It's all about centralized power. Rest In Hell G-burg.

[–]Nemacolin 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

Perhaps a cat walked across your keyboard.

[–]JasonCarswell 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

POTUS = President Of The United States

SCOTUS = Supreme Court Of The United States

https://duckduckgo.com/?q=SCOTUS

Perhaps you're lazy.

[–]Nemacolin 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Upon further reflection, I don't suppose we can blame a cat for your posts.

[–]JasonCarswell 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

LOL.

My cat died in February. Time to get a new one.

[–]RedPillDessert 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

So who is the most pro-white anti-blm candidate here?

[–]Antifa 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Pretry rare I and slightly evil to give a yessss when you hear someone died but there you go

[–]Jesus 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Progressive but not for Palestine.