you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]PencilPusher55 20 insightful - 1 fun20 insightful - 0 fun21 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Rowling was always someone I found to be conflicting. Like, yeah on one hand you could write her off as just another Hollywood Liberal - but I read somewhere that she actually LOST her networth of being a billionaire because she donated so much to charity. It's hard to criticize someone that will give more to help others than you will most likely make in your lifetime.

[–]Kupsofjoe 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Charity or mebe she wanted tax breaks?

[–]Chipit 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Easy come, easy go. It was never real money to her anyhow. She's much more enamored of the internet cool points she gets for being a philanthropist. Of course, many philanthropists were horrible people: Carnegie, Rockefeller, Gates.

[–]Kupsofjoe 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The road to hell...