use the following search parameters to narrow your results:
e.g. subreddit:pics site:imgur.com dog
subreddit:pics site:imgur.com dog
advanced search: by author, sub...
~3 users here now
The Donald can't handle critical thought. This little comment got me banned.
submitted 3 years ago by Canbot from thedonald.win
view the rest of the comments →
[–]comments 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - 3 years ago (7 children)
Which comment exactly got you banned?
[–]Canbot[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - 3 years ago (6 children)
There is only one comment. It is a link to that particular one.
[–]comments 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - 3 years ago (5 children)
Oh I see, sorry, I didn't look closely enough, I thought you meant one of the comments in the OP of the linked page.
The comment is deleted, what did it say?
[–]Canbot[S] 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun - 3 years ago (4 children)
Sorry, it was still there when I made the link. They have now deleted it. It was: This forum is controlled by cambridge analytica and the majority of the votes and comments are astroturfed. Here is the original discussion.
[–]comments 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - 3 years ago (2 children)
Oh, interesting, thanks. It's a bit confusing to sort through when just casually browsing here, that's a pretty important claim though... if you summarized it here, might help a few more people be aware of what's going on.
[–]Canbot[S] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun - 3 years ago (1 child)
Well the claim was not serious. The point was simply to test if I would get banned for it. One could argue that it was trolling, but I think it walks the line. I could see how someone of a certain persuasion could legitimately believe that and so they should be able to have a conversation about that.
[–]comments 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 3 years ago (0 children)
oh. :/ it confuses the information stream when you choose a test that requires spreading fake information, you know. and it confuses the test result -- would you have been banned for a clearly legitimate criticism of the main views there?
[–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 3 years ago (0 children)
It's bi-partisan after all.
view the rest of the comments →
[–]comments 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - (7 children)
[–]Canbot[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - (6 children)
[–]comments 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - (5 children)
[–]Canbot[S] 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun - (4 children)
[–]comments 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - (2 children)
[–]Canbot[S] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun - (1 child)
[–]comments 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)
[–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)