The only circumstantial evidence, if you can call it that we have of Epstein's death is Epstein's alleged body being moved from New York hospital to medical examiner's office, which is a video from Voice of America.

Voice of America before the 2012 Smith-Mundt Modernization Act, which effectively allows propaganda and psychological operations to be broadcasted and disseminated domestically was a major propaganda channel broadcasting psychological operations to foreign audiences. They are now allowed to spread this same propaganda domestically targeted at the U.S. population.

The two cameras malfunction narrative is implausible, the convenience of this occurring in front of Epstein allegedly in his cell can not be coincidental.

In Hosenball, Mark (August 28, 2019). "FBI studies two broken cameras outside cell where Epstein died: source". Reuters., we read:

Two cameras that malfunctioned outside the jail cell where financier Jeffrey Epstein died as he awaited trial on sex-trafficking charges have been sent to an FBI crime lab for examination, a law enforcement source told Reuters.

So, not all cameras, just two that were situated near Epstein's alleged jail cell? What law enforcement source told Reuters this? Of course they will never disclose this unnamed source, so we must take their word for it. And we know Reuters has historically lied about atrocious false flags, so I would not be surprised that they fabricated this entire story. Like everything in the media, the primary source is always hearsay.

Epstein’s lawyers Reid Weingarten [Zionist Jew] and Martin Weinberg [Zionist Jew] told U.S. District Judge Richard Berman [Zionist Jew] in Manhattan on Tuesday they had doubts about the New York City chief medical examiner’s conclusion that their client killed himself.

The two cameras were within view of the Manhattan jail cell where he was found dead on Aug. 10. A source earlier told Reuters two jail guards failed to follow a procedure overnight to make separate checks on all prisoners every 30 minutes.

Another unnamed source. Why should we believe it. Do we have proof Epstein was even at the facility?

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-people-jeffrey-epstein-cameras-idUSKCN1VI2LC

Mark Hosenball, it should be noted was an advocate of centralized intelligence control reading his past articles and a pusher of 9/11 official government approved conspiracy theories, i.e., the official story. Might this psyop be a revelation of method designed to create the needed disorder and chaos in so that they can surveil and curtail this chaos resulting in more centralized judicial control?

The failures here have nothing to do with the removal of suicide watch too, could it be that Epstein was given access to a ligature and that the officers were asleep instead of doing the routine 30 minute checks. Well, all of this is hearsay backed up by unnamed sources. No proof has ever been given.

At 6:30 a.m., at least one of the guards discovered him in his cell...”

What kind of fact is “at least one?”

The more you read these articles, the more obvious the psyop trigger words become.

The people who described their interactions with Mr. Epstein and the conditions in the jail almost all spoke only on condition of anonymity...”

Why are witnesses talking to the Times but not to the FBI, which says many MCC employees won’t talk? Why won’t they talk and why isn’t the Times even mentioning that?

Probably because this is a PSYOP narrative and they are deliberately using various tactics in perception management which are utilized extensively in PSYOPs. Such as the ambiguity method: where they will disseminate two opposing narratives, which are both ambiguous enough to confuse large swaths of the population.

Five days later, Mr. Epstein was found unconscious in his cell, with marks on his neck.”

If this is “a possible suicide attempt,” what kind of marks were on his neck, as others here ask but the Times doesn’t, and how do you make yourself unconscious?

The British press (see Daily Mail) covering the story have repeatedly asked about CCTV. The Times doesn’t mention it. Was there a camera on the hall outside his cell and if so, what’s on the video?

You'll never see this footage because it likely doesn't exist and if it does, it doesn't show what it is suppose to.

By late in the week, there was one small difference: The vending machines were full again.”

Is this how you end an article on the suspicious death of one of the most famous alleged prisoners in the last 50 years?

A snarky crack about vending machines? To call that bad taste would be a polite way of describing it. Bad judgment might be more accurate. The word adolescent might apply. Or the use PSYOP might suffice. If these Zionist journalists are in the know, they probably cannot help but make a joke of the absurdity of all this.

It was reported a week later that at least one camera in the hallway outside Epstein's cell had footage that was unusable, although other usable footage was recorded in the area.

Okay, what does at least one mean? And what does unusable entail? Also, what does other usable footage in the area entail, which area? How far from his alleged cell?

These questions will never be answered nor asked by the zionist controlled media.

On July 23, three weeks prior to his death, Epstein was found unconscious in his jail cell with injuries to his neck.

Hearsay.

Epstein believed he was attacked by his cellmate, who was awaiting trial for four counts of murder, while the correctional staff suspected attempted suicide.

Probably another psyop. Oh, is there any proof that Epstein is dead or that he was at the facility?

Many of Epstein's accusers cases are dropped and it is likely that he will not be charged for anything in the future. Although, I believe Epstein trafficked children, I also am skeptical of the various narratives being broadcasted about him. I think many of his accusers are playing parts and that a lot of the current narratives are PSYOPS. I believe what we are seeing is largely a coordinated 'revelation of method' propaganda campaign. Dorsowitz made this campaign pretty obvious when he tried to normalize pedophilia and was allowed to utter such words on mainstream media.

For example:

According to various sources, Epstein, beginning in the early 2000s, showed a strong interest in improving the human race through genetic engineering and artificial intelligence, including using his own sperm. He addressed the scientific community at various events and occasions and communicated his fascination with eugenics.

It was reported in August 2019 that Epstein had planned to "seed the human race with his DNA" by impregnating up to 20 women at a time using his New Mexico compound as a "baby ranch", where mothers would give birth to his offspring. He was an advocate of cryonics and his own idiosyncratic version of transhumanism, and had said that he intended to have his penis and head frozen.

Apart from his many connections to MIT, cryogenics and DARPA Transhunmanist programs, I think a lot of these titles are very sensationalist. Again, we must rely on hearsay.

One adherent of transhumanism said that he and Mr. Epstein discussed the financier’s interest in cryonics, an unproven science in which people’s bodies are frozen to be brought back to life in the future. Mr. Epstein told this person that he wanted his head and penis to be frozen.

So, just one adherent? Who is this adherent? We will never know. I'm almost positive this story is fabricated not because I'm covering for Epstein but because I think the media is using these stories to demoralize the population.

Mr. Epstein over the years confided to scientists and others about his scheme, according to four people familiar with his thinking, although there is no evidence that it ever came to fruition.

LMFAO, give me a break with this bullcrap. PSYOP: "According to 'four' persons 'familiar' with his thinking. No, not related to him or friends of him but four unnamed sources familiar with another person's thinking, lol. This entire story is fabricated, trust me.

Mr. Epstein told scientists and businessmen about his ambitions to use his New Mexico ranch as a base where women would be inseminated with his sperm and would give birth to his babies, according to two award-winning scientists and an adviser to large companies and wealthy individuals, all of whom Mr. Epstein told about it.

Which scientists and businessmen? So, we are suppose to believe he told unnamed people about his want to inseminate women with his sperm and that the source that told the NYT's this are also unnamed. But of course we can trust them because they're two award-winning scientists and an unnamed advisor to a very "bigly large" company, so big in fact that everything this unnamed source says must be true. Can't forget the the rest of the unnamed wealthy individuals that heard it too.

Though I do not doubt that Epstein was part of some sort of transhumanist agenda, we cannot trust the media who can legally fabricate stories. When primary sources are hearsay and unnamed sources familiar with persons thinking, we must question the credibility and agenda of these articles.