use the following search parameters to narrow your results:
e.g. subreddit:pics site:imgur.com dog
subreddit:pics site:imgur.com dog
advanced search: by author, sub...
~4 users here now
memes
Whoa.
submitted 11 months ago by Chipit from pbs.twimg.com
view the rest of the comments →
[–]Site_rly_sux 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 11 months ago (4 children)
But it's true
According to your dipshit interpretations.
Other people have just as valid interpretations in the total opposite direction to you.
Equally as valid as your nonsense views are the nonsense views of other people...can't believe I'm having to explain this....but the lessons and themes you take away from movies are not universal
[–]Vulptex 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun - 11 months ago (3 children)
It's quite apparent, and the writers admitted it.
[–]Site_rly_sux 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 11 months ago (2 children)
First of all, when creators expand upon their creative visions, it's usually not referred to as them "admitting".
Secondly, why don't you link to some authoritative source that backs you up, instead of jabbering on
[–]TemporarilyDeceased 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun - 11 months ago (1 child)
Why is he expected to list another source when you aren't?
[–]Site_rly_sux 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - 11 months ago (0 children)
Because he made a claim and I didn't
He said "the writers admitted it". I make no claims about knowing what the writers did or did not intend with their creative vision.
My claim is nonsense: "the agents represent transphobia" is as much BS as whatever OP believes. But neither of OP or I are insisting we have the only correct interpretation according to the wachowski's "admittals" or whatever
"The writers admitted it" is a claim about the shared objective reality which he should be able to back up. He wants me to accept that his interpretation of a movie is the only correct one, because of some claimed statements by the wachowskis, so he should link them
view the rest of the comments →
[–]Site_rly_sux 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (4 children)
[–]Vulptex 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun - (3 children)
[–]Site_rly_sux 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (2 children)
[–]TemporarilyDeceased 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun - (1 child)
[–]Site_rly_sux 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)