Whoa.

submitted by Chipit from pbs.twimg.com

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Vulptex 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

It's quite apparent, and the writers admitted it.

[–]Site_rly_sux 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

First of all, when creators expand upon their creative visions, it's usually not referred to as them "admitting".

Secondly, why don't you link to some authoritative source that backs you up, instead of jabbering on

[–]TemporarilyDeceased 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Why is he expected to list another source when you aren't?

[–]Site_rly_sux 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Because he made a claim and I didn't

He said "the writers admitted it". I make no claims about knowing what the writers did or did not intend with their creative vision.

My claim is nonsense: "the agents represent transphobia" is as much BS as whatever OP believes. But neither of OP or I are insisting we have the only correct interpretation according to the wachowski's "admittals" or whatever

"The writers admitted it" is a claim about the shared objective reality which he should be able to back up. He wants me to accept that his interpretation of a movie is the only correct one, because of some claimed statements by the wachowskis, so he should link them