you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Vulptex 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

Oh I see how it is. You don't dare discriminate against women or black people, but discriminating against white men is perfectly valid. Is that right?

When it comes to the 13% comitting 50% of violent crimes you'll investigate the circumstances which make it harder for them to avoid. But when it's men you say don't help them, don't care about them, be prejudiced against them, no differently than what racists think of blacks! Or imagine if it were the other way around, I guarantee that you guys would be slamming this as misogyny.

Just admit that the libs are every bit as sexist and racist as the cons. And in fact the only reason cons have been for the past 3 years is because they feel the need to push back against extreme leftist discrimination.

So if we aren't going to be sexist or racist, no it shouldn't matter at all to policy makers. But it seems 99% of the human race is incapable of even entertaining the thought, so everyone is just going to attack me.

[–]ActuallyNot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Spending tax dollars effectively is perfectly valid.

Conversely, wasting tax dollars is not.

When it comes to the 13% comitting 50% of violent crimes you'll investigate the circumstances which make it harder for them to avoid.

What?

From before:

Everyone on both sides of the isle wants to go back to 1950s gender roles

What?