What's Okay To Censor?

submitted by CompleteDoubterII from pbs.twimg.com

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]JasonCarswell 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (6 children)

A++

[–]CompleteDoubterII[S] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)

What? Why? (Isn't the maximum grade A+, anyway?)

[–]JasonCarswell 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

A+ is good
A++ is great, worth sharing with truth-seekers
A+++ is very rare, brilliant, to the point, and worth sharing with the sheeple

[–]CompleteDoubterII[S] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

Why is a meme about hentai worth sharing with truth-seekers? Or, if it isn't, why does it get the grade which indicates this?

[–]JasonCarswell 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

I thought it was funny and insightful. It's also about free-speech - the most critical issue facing truth-seekers.

[–]CompleteDoubterII[S] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

I don't think the truth seekers would support censorship, so I'm not so sure what this meme would change their mind on.

By the way, you seem to rate all my comments you respond to as both 'funny' and 'insightful'. Why?

[–]JasonCarswell 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

The truth seekers have to fight censorship, obviously. The red hat is not a truther. The White face calls the red hat out on his hypocrisy. That short circuits his programming. It's not a puzzle. It's a joke.

"Insightful" and "Fun". I'm generous and have fun. You are not alone. I do it for everyone - especially in long threads. I can see where I've been. If someone's an asstroll I might only give them +1 to "mark it read" and if they have a point but used an unpleasant form of expression (ie. Niggot). I'll give them 0 if they're trash.

I never mark comments or posts I haven't read, even if the title sounds good.

If we had a rating of 0-10 then you'd see much more interesting ratings from me - and in the community, I would hope - like IMDb. It wouldn't be perfect but as it is, this system is critically flawed anyway. Votes don't count for shit - except the short potential for eyes and awareness. That ephemeral quality is not really very valuable. But it's better than nothing.