What's Okay To Censor?

submitted by CompleteDoubterII from pbs.twimg.com

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]CompleteDoubterII[S] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (17 children)

Since the link this post uses doesn't work, here's one that does.

[–]JasonCarswell 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (16 children)

A++

[–]CompleteDoubterII[S] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)

What? Why? (Isn't the maximum grade A+, anyway?)

[–]JasonCarswell 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

A+ is good
A++ is great, worth sharing with truth-seekers
A+++ is very rare, brilliant, to the point, and worth sharing with the sheeple

[–]CompleteDoubterII[S] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

Why is a meme about hentai worth sharing with truth-seekers? Or, if it isn't, why does it get the grade which indicates this?

[–]JasonCarswell 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

I thought it was funny and insightful. It's also about free-speech - the most critical issue facing truth-seekers.

[–]CompleteDoubterII[S] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

I don't think the truth seekers would support censorship, so I'm not so sure what this meme would change their mind on.

By the way, you seem to rate all my comments you respond to as both 'funny' and 'insightful'. Why?

[–]JasonCarswell 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

The truth seekers have to fight censorship, obviously. The red hat is not a truther. The White face calls the red hat out on his hypocrisy. That short circuits his programming. It's not a puzzle. It's a joke.

"Insightful" and "Fun". I'm generous and have fun. You are not alone. I do it for everyone - especially in long threads. I can see where I've been. If someone's an asstroll I might only give them +1 to "mark it read" and if they have a point but used an unpleasant form of expression (ie. Niggot). I'll give them 0 if they're trash.

I never mark comments or posts I haven't read, even if the title sounds good.

If we had a rating of 0-10 then you'd see much more interesting ratings from me - and in the community, I would hope - like IMDb. It wouldn't be perfect but as it is, this system is critically flawed anyway. Votes don't count for shit - except the short potential for eyes and awareness. That ephemeral quality is not really very valuable. But it's better than nothing.

[–]CompleteDoubterII[S] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (9 children)

You responded to this comment approximately one hour and two minutes after I posted it. How did you know it existed so soon? I don't think it would have appeared in your feed.

[–]JasonCarswell 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (8 children)

1) I start at the top of my 300+ unanswered messages, dealing with the recent stuff first. More like a chat than a correspondence.

2) When I respond I can respond directly to the comment, look at the context, or unless there are 30+ comments I'll go directly to the post and see what else is new there. - That's how I found it so "fast".

3) You said "Thanks" on this page which brought me here.

[–]CompleteDoubterII[S] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (7 children)

I completely forgot about (3). My brain is small.

You have 300+ unanswered messages and you respond to them? How much time do you spend on this site per day? (Of course, writing 'per day' assumes you spend a similar amount of time on this site every day, which may not be true.)

[–]JasonCarswell 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (6 children)

I spend most of my days on the computer, but not always on SaidIt.

That 300+ has backed up over the last couple years. If I were better at managing myself I would deal with them before going on to new content.

[–]CompleteDoubterII[S] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)

I see.

By the way, the only reason I was on this post today (and thus said 'thanks') was because I noticed the trend that the only time I go viral is when I post something critical of some of the right. I've gone viral again, and the reaction was hilarious.

[–]JasonCarswell 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

The left-right thing is ridic. I lean old-left to be sure, but I am in no tribe.

It's nice to see the left is represented enough to vote that up, though I'm not sure half of the viewers get that it's a brilliant shit on the tribalists, especially the right. They think it's great to think "leftists bad" just because the SJWs are making it bad for everyone.

Thanks for linking me to it.

[–]CompleteDoubterII[S] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

You're welcome. (And this time, it's my own work; unlike this post.)

the SJWs are making it bad for everyone.

What do you mean? Sure, they're annoying, and seeing media (films, cartoons, some anime) pander to them is really annoying, but I don't think they hold much power in the real world.

[–]JasonCarswell 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

The insane left is distracting from the legit left while pushing everyone and the Overton Window to the right. They are progress-repellent.