you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]CreditKnifeMan 5 insightful - 4 fun5 insightful - 3 fun6 insightful - 4 fun -  (4 children)

Actual science requires measurement and real world observation.

Theoretical physics was the beginning of "$cience".

[–]0rco 5 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 3 fun -  (3 children)

"It doesn't matter how beautiful your theory is, it doesn't matter how smart you are. If it doesn't agree with experiment, it's wrong." Richard P. Feynman

[–]CreditKnifeMan 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

This is reality.

Feynman was also a theoretical physicist.

If it doesn't agree with experiment, it's wrong.

$cientific research is controlled by grant funding gatekeepers from the beginning.

$cientific journals gatekeep the published results of $cientific research.

The only aspect of science that isn't defacto gatekeeper controlled is the experiment.

I wouldn't be the least bit surprised to learn that the $cientific "experiment$" were also selected to produce predetermined results.

Find me a video of a nuclear explosion that has a blast that impacts the overhead cloud cover.

And I'll show you a video of "invincible clouds".

Clouds are inexplicably impervious to nuclear weapons. Weird, right?

[–]0rco 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Are you saying nuclear bombs don't exist? Because that's what I think.

[–]CreditKnifeMan 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Are you saying nuclear bombs don't exist? Because that's what I think.

I can't prove they don't exist. Maybe they do.

I also can't prove the Easter bunny doesn't exist.

But.. I've never seen a cloud disturbed in any video of a alleged thermonuclear explosion.

And I've looked at numerous videos, and the clouds are uniformly unaffected.

They do however, continue to drift with the wind.