China Develops New More Protective Anal Mask | The Babylon Bee

submitted by christnmusicreleases from (babylonbee.com)

all 69 comments
sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun

[–]Tom_Bombadil 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (61 children)

The neighbor's kids know the masks don't work.

They say, "If your pants don't stop farts, then the mask won't stop Covid."

The Chinese govt was probably spying on them, and has now decided to take retaliatory measures.

The irony is these kids go to a Mandarin immersion school.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (60 children)

Kids are so smart...

(And this is not a good argument for not wearing masks - and thus supporting the spread of COVID19 - because a fascist Christian website made an anal joke about it. Why not trust the science?)

[–]Tom_Bombadil 6 insightful - 3 fun6 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 3 fun -  (40 children)

And this is not a good argument for not wearing masks - and thus supporting the spread of COVID19

What do you mean by "supporting the spread of Covid-19"?

[–]JasonCarswell 4 insightful - 4 fun4 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 4 fun -  (26 children)

You're trying to squeeze intelligence from a stone.

He's blind to what he cannot see.

[–]Tom_Bombadil 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

It's a bot. A retarded bot.

I'm writing at the re-bot, to communicate the facts to the lurking readers.

[–]JasonCarswell 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

As am I. Usually ~75% for the benefit of readers.

I wouldn't be so mean as to call the SocksBot retarded, though some perceptions might be. I try to empathize with the SocksBot and recall times in my life where I had a mental blockage and simply couldn't see past whatever it was. SocksBot seems to have faith in his dear leaders and authority and for some reason simply can't give it up. It's a dogma of the worst kind.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (23 children)

Am I supposed to see conspircy theories about why we should not trust science? Thanks to Saidit, I've seen some of them.

[–]JasonCarswell 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (7 children)

The ONLY science I trust is open science that can be universally verified.

I do not trust ANY authorities telling me to believe them.

Especially when they censor anyone who even tries to question them.

Trying to subvert any skepticism by pejoratively labeling it "conspiracy theory" only works on feeble minded sheeple who are already well brainwashed. Conspiracy theories come in all shapes and sizes, good, bad, and ugly, and/or everything in between. They're not all equal. You (and everyone else) should already know that.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

Then you'll agree with the science regarding masks. Seems we would agree.

[–]JasonCarswell 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Many officials have come around and stated that masks are moot and the lockdown is tyrannical bullshit.

I agree with them more than you.

[–]jet199 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (4 children)

Show one country where infections have gone down after masks were introduced.

Can you?

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

New Zealand, etc. etc.

[–]Tom_Bombadil 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Source?

[–]Airbus320 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Lul

[–]Tom_Bombadil 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (14 children)

conspircy theories Evidence about why we should not trust scienceism?

CDC Reveals Hospitals Counted Heart Attacks as COVID-19 Deaths

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (13 children)

Unimportant, Tom. Wear a mask.

[–]Tom_Bombadil 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (8 children)

Unimportant

At least you admit to ignoring the actual facts.

Well, it appears you've been beaten down so much with actual measurable evidence that you've given up on any attempt of an intellectual rebuttal.

Hopefully, your IT dept will see this exchange and deletes your program in disgrace.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

Unimportant because the mistaken numbers are insignificant, Tom (and COVID complications can cause a heard attack). Why did you not know that? Perhaps look at the big picture:

https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/

[–]Questionable 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (3 children)

Look, your English is really breaking down. Maybe you could ask your supervisor for a new assignment.

[–]Tom_Bombadil 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

Ha! The counter for this is a joke.

Covid deaths are misclassified fatalities of all varieties.

Garbage in; garbage out..

The data you're looking for can be found here: https://tinyurl.com/y3mm5akz

Now quit being stupid. Encourage everyone you know to immediately go with you to get a couple of those experimental mRNA injectable therapies.
Gates says they're safe, so don't think to much about it.

Also, Don't forget to remind them to wear thirty-three FACEMASKS during their every waking hour.

They will need to continue wearing all thirty-three FACEMASKS for the foreseeable future, because the vaccinesexperimental mRNA injectables are.. um... super effective. Ask Gates.

[–]JasonCarswell 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

Put on your own muzzle and shut the fuck up.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Because you say so? And why so hostile?

[–]JasonCarswell 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

You're telling everyone to wear masks as if the "science is settled" and like it would make a difference, when clearly it's far from settled and they even admit the entire scamdemic has been mishandled.

If you think "shut the fuck up" is hostile, then maybe I should swear more often to emphasize my points. If you prefer I could call you names instead. I promise I'll be witty and clever - unless you prefer blunt force.

For the readers, in truth, I was hesitant to even be so "hostile". I'm never afraid to swear, but usually there's a good reason. In this case the only reason is that it flowed like a common soundbite from a movie, in hopes that it would conclude and punctuate the absurdity from socks, which I fear will never end.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (12 children)

...by not wearing a mask.

[–]Tom_Bombadil 4 insightful - 4 fun4 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 4 fun -  (11 children)

And this is not a good argument for not wearing masks - and thus supporting the spread of COVID19.

...by not wearing a mask.

You're clearly confused.

According to the CDC fairytale Covid is the name used for the symptoms of the fake virus that they haven't isolated...

Stopping the spread of symptoms with a face mask is laughable, and stupid.

It's obvious that you graduated at the bottom of your class at the shill academy.

FAIL!

[–]JasonCarswell 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

It's also worth pointing to all the documentation from the "authorities" that state masks are moot.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (9 children)

No need to be so defensive and hostile, Todd. The science regarding masks is not arguable.

[–]Tom_Bombadil 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

The science regarding masks is not arguable.

Not by you anyway.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Or by you

[–]Tom_Bombadil 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

Or by you

Classic bot response

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

sick burn...

[–]JasonCarswell 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

Yet you're arguing - despite the officials stating that masks are moot.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

No they're not saying that, and that's not how to use moot in a sentence.

[–]JasonCarswell 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

That is how I use moot as others do. It can mean debatable, in question, inconsequential, or irrelevant. There are also other historical meanings.

My off the cuff definitions above are proven correct. I can't believe I let you make me doubt for a moment. You are indeed a timesuck and a dumbass, in short: suck ass.

https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/moot

https://duckduckgo.com/?q=moot

"Moot refers to a subject for academic argument."

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I refer to usage, not definition. You said:

masks are moot

Moot in this case is used as a noun, which would not work in this context.

In order to use moot as an adjective, it should come before a noun or argument

This is also not the way it would be used as a verb.

A discussion or process can be mooted or also moot, but not an object.

[–]JasonCarswell 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (18 children)

Why not trust the corporations, government, media, and their "science"?

Seriously?

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (17 children)

You know that's not the issue, not in the manner it's written here.

Trust the facts, the science, not Saiditors

[–]JasonCarswell 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

It's not about smart kids either. It's about stupid policies based on corrupt science, in a corrupt media liars, with "facts" presented from tribalist and divisive sources that depend on our believing in them.

The entire scamdemic is a confusion psyop, hypernormalization, where nothing is verifiable, everything is chaos, and society is manipulated and engineered into doing things against our own interests.

At least admit that social engineering exists.

[–]Airbus320 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (12 children)

What if the person is secular and rejects scientism?

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (11 children)

Then the person is a hypocrite and an idiot - if using the internet (developed with help of science) to argue about science.

[–]Questionable 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (5 children)

¿uɐʍs ǝɥʇ ʎq ɹǝʇʇnq ʇnuɐǝd sʇɐǝ puɐ nuǝX pɹo˥ uᴉ sǝʌᴉǝlǝq uosɹǝd ʇɐɥʇ ɟᴉ ʇɐɥM?

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Alright Frank, you see what's happening here. Saidit is making us both crazy.

[–]Questionable 4 insightful - 4 fun4 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 4 fun -  (3 children)

I believe that's your handlers doing. Sorry for your loss.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

No need to be a dick, Frank.

[–]JasonCarswell 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (3 children)

Authentic science is never free from potentially corrupted humans and power.

"Leaders" may promote scientism, outright lie, be misinformed, ignorant, or downright evil. They may also pull levers to censor, hard, soft, or otherwise.

Only an dogmatic idiot believes everything they're told (ie. corrupt scientism) without critically thinking it over first.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Really? Assessing accuracy in scientific research isn't so difficult. The irony is that authritarian assholes developed the criticisms you mentioned to make you believe that scientists are oppressing you. Consider the sources for this nonsense.

[–]JasonCarswell 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

It is indeed difficult if the powers that be whom you work for censor accurate, authentic, open science that's out of their control.

You simply can't admit that the ruling class has influence over science, like any other aspect of life under their full spectrum dominance.

You can't even admit that social engineering exists.

"The irony is that authritarian [sic] assholes developed the criticisms you mentioned to make you believe that scientists are oppressing you. Consider the sources for this nonsense."

Teach me your wisdom. Who are these authoritarian assholes you speak of? Which criticisms? What sources? What nonsense.

Scientists are NOT oppressing us - however, the corrupt corporatocracy and their minions are trying to oppress us. Sure some are stupid sheeple, but obviously they're failing to oppress MANY of us. They'd need better bullshit narratives and much better shills than you to be successful on this front. On other fronts, like their engineered looming global food crises, they may murder more than a fuck tonne.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I can agree with the points you mention about social engineering and the influence of the 1%, though only on a case-by-case basis. Regarding COVID19, my main concern is that there are reliable methods in place to stop the spread of the virus. Yes, there are associated problems by the 1% and social engineering, but the propaganda and lies spread by babylonbee.com are also part of their own social engineering and voter manipulation approaches. Seems we may disagree on who is involved in the influencing and social engineering approaches against the science regarding COVID19.

[–]Airbus320 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

😮

[–]Questionable 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Yes, trust the science, the experts. They are the authority on this matter, and authority is not to be Questioned.

[–]FuckMasks 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

So, don't trust you? Because you're a 'saiditor' ?

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

That's right - don't necessarily trust me or others you don't know. I'm unimportant. 1000s of scientists' medical research would be more reliable.

[–]JasonCarswell 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (4 children)

I won't wear the new anal mask until they prove that it's better than my home made diapers made of M95 masks, duct tape, and Saran Wrap.

[–]Airbus320 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (3 children)

Careful u/socks will scold you!

[–]JasonCarswell 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (2 children)

I wonder what /u/FuckSocks will do?

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Perhaps I should be honored

[–]JasonCarswell 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Ya, but no.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Thank you, christnmusicreleases for another look at a subversive website that wants people to avoid wearing masks, and thus help spread the virus, and thus extend the lockdown, causing additional problems for the 99%, while the 1% reap the rewards.

[–]JasonCarswell 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

The threat is all in your mind.

The lockdown has never been legit.

Pointing out this does not extend the lockdown.

The powers that be will end lockdown when they want to end the class war - or more likely, have better ways to distract, deceive, manipulate, dominate, exploit, and exterminate.